AG of IN admits that complaint by attorney Orly Taitz against the Sec of State and Elections Commission is not dismissed with Prejudice
Posted by By GeorgeM at 22 July, at 04 : 55 AM Print
Press Release
Attorney General of Indiana stipulates (admits) that Causes of action of Fraud, Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Negligence against the Sec of State of Indiana Connie Lawson and Elections Commission brought by attorney Orly Taitz were never heard on the merits and should not have been dismissed. They stipulate that these causes of action are not dismissed with prejudice. After 4 years of struggle this is the first such admission by the chief law enforcement officer of a state!!!
IN Final First amended Complaint
This is really big as for the first time after 230 cases filed all over the nation by some 40 attorneys and hundreds of pro se litigants, a chief law enforcement officer of a state, Attorney General of Indiana Gregory F. Zoeller admits: “Respondents (here respondents are Secretary of State and Elections Commission)are willing to stipulate (it means admit, agree with the plaintiff) that the other claims (breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and fraud) that were never before the court are not dismissed with prejudice, but reserve all defenses including those related to statute of limitations”.
This is a milestone. It means that they agree that plaintiffs can proceed on the merits. Statute of limitations will not be a problem, as we acted timely.
Thank you god!
Other issues listed in the response are boiler plate and most of it is not true. Attorney Orly Taitz filed a timely complaint of elections fraud with Indiana Secretary of State. Such complaint can be filed by any citizens, it is similar to NH, citizens of other states, who have evidence of elections fraud can file such complaint. Other plaintiffs already signed that they want to join me in this motion. If you are a resident of Indiana and want to join, please do so. There is strength in numbers. Donations are needed to cover expenses of this and other legal actions to remove Obama from 2012 ballot due to identity fraud end elections fraud and use of forged IDs. More info on OrlyTaitzESQ.com
Law offices of Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
End of Press Release
–
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, cases are still active– need your help NOW!
Support the Florida and Other Ballot Challenges!
Constitution Action Fund
Even if you don’t donate, at least click and read the above.
These funds should not be confused with Taitz’s own fund.
What is the Article II Legal Defense Fund? Find out.
Only a natural born Citizen can legally be President of the USA. ”Obama” is not either.
Subscribe free to ObamaBallotChallenge.com. Please forward. We’re also on Facebook
No one, not even Orly, is that stupid.
The case was dismissed. There’s a good reason the claims the stipulate were never heard, as they were never before the court and are not before the court now. And never will be.
The only thing before the court is the Rule 60 Motion. That’s it. There will be no “hearing on the merits”.
By being completely mistaken on the very plain English on the response, or flat-out lying about it, she can then just claim the court is corrupt when she receives no hearing on the merits, and the idiots who follow her will believe it.
I’m relatively certain you won’t post the truth, but this is it, whether you, or Orly, like it or not.
realist, 11 months ago
Read the IN Response then the press release then try not to laugh, I dare you.
“I screwed up, it’s too late and I want another bite of the apple any way.” I am not a lawyer and even I get it.
Teri, 11 months ago