Breaking: CA Voters, including Presidential Candidate, Challenge Obama on California Ballot

Posted by By at 19 January, at 22 : 56 PM Print

Breaking: CA Voters, including Presidential Candidate,  Challenge Obama on California Ballot

NaturalBornNews 

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Breaking News: January 19, 2012 ~ Precedent Case For Restraint of Fund Raising for Obama: Writ of Mandate ~ Served on the California Secretary of State.

Sacramento – A legal complaint was served on Obama for America (California) and the California Secretary of State Debra Bowen late Tuesday to keep British-born Barack Obama off the ballot for the Office of the President, because he does not meet the Constitutional requirement of being a U.S. Natural Born citizen according to the Supreme Court precedent Minor v. Happersett.  The legal action was filed Jan. 6 in Sacramento Superior Court by a group of 7 ad hoc registered voters including an American Independent Party candidate for President.

Several of the petitioners tried seeking resolution against Obama after the 2008 presidential election, but they were told by the California courts that it was too late to make challenges to Obama’s legitimacy, and that they did not have “standing”.

The Writ requests a temporary restraining order of Respondent Debra Bowen (SOS) to bar Obama on the Democratic Party ballot in the primary and/or General Election until the matter of eligibility and ballot access for Respondent Obama is heard. The Writ also requested a temporary restraining order against Respondent Obama and or his agents associated with the Obama for America California from further fundraising in California until further notice by the court. A final demand was for a permanent Injunction against Respondent Obama and Respondent SOS as to Respondent Obama’s ineligibility, barring him from ballot access.

Seven California voters have drawn up the Writ of Mandate over the absence of Constitutional authority and documentation that Barack Obama is eligible to occupy the Oval Office. No dual nationality citizen has ever been declared a U.S. NATURAL BORN Citizen.  The Supreme Court ruled in Minor v. Happersett that a person must be born within the jurisdiction of the U.S. to two U.S. citizen parents and it has been never been overturned. The U.S. Congress in 2009 usurped the U.S. Constitution when they confirmed Mr. Obama for the Office of the Presidency.  They  attempted to revise the U.S. Constitution without an Amendment by confirming Obama as POTUS.

One of the seven California Petitioners is Edward C. Noonan of Olivehurst, Yuba County, CA. He is currently a 2012 Presidential candidate for the American Independent Party.

The other six California petitioners are Pamela Barnett (Director of ObamaBallotChallenge.com), Sharon Chickering, George Miller, Tony Dolz, Neil Turner, and Gary Wilmott. All seven petitioners are affirmed as Ad Hoc registered voters of California, each self represented without an attorney.

The cause of the petition is that Mr. Barack Obama does not qualify for the Office of President of the United States because both of his parents were not U.S. Citizens at the time of Obama’s birth. Article II of the US Constitution states that only Natural Born Citizens qualify for the Office of President. Barack Obama’s father was a foreign national of Kenya. This disqualifies Mr. Obama to be Commander in Chief as well as POTUS.

Mr. Noonan said, “Mr. Obama cannot be a natural born citizen.” “It doesn’t matter whether or not he was born in Hawaii, it is a fact that his father was not a citizen of the U.S. at the time of Obama’s birth which disqualifies Mr. Obama from holding the Office,” he said.

“I have a right as a Petitioner to have standing and relief with the California Secretary of State’s Elections Division because I am candidate for 2012 Presidential Campaign,” he said. “The California Elections Code Section §13314 guarantees me the right to challenge the qualifications of Mr. Obama.”

He pointed out that Election Code §13314 states the any challenge needs to be before the ballots are printed.

 (a)(1) An elector may seek a writ of mandate alleging that an error or omission has occurred, or is about to occur, in the placing of a name on, or in the printing of, a ballot, sample ballot, voter pamphlet, or other official matter, or that any neglect of duty has occurred, or is about to occur.

He also said, “We are attempting to correct the errors, omissions, or other neglects of the SOS that are in violation of the Election Code and the US Constitution.”

Mr. Noonan said, “If Mr. Obama is not a Natural Born Citizen as the US Constitution demands of all candidates for US President to be, then this violates the US Constitution.”

Neil Turner, one of the seven petitioners stated, “They, the Congress, Supreme Court and the White House, in fact apparently conspired to revise the U.S. Constitution without an Amendment, by attempting to eliminate the requirement that a President be a NATURAL BORN Citizen.”

Pamela Barnett, Retired Captain, also one of the seven petitioners said,  “The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals told me that I did not have standing to challenge Obama regarding his eligibility after the election in 2008, so I am now part of a legal action to require the California court to rule on Obama’s eligibility for the first time.”

“We have been trying to have Obama’s eligibility heard in court on the merits for 3 years, but citizens were denied standing after the election in 2008.  California has a statute that gives us standing before the ballots are printed. We hope that our judge will honor the Constitution and California law and have a fair hearing on the merits and rule on existing Natural Born law,” said Barnett.

“This is about the rule of law.  No man should be above it.  We need to honor the Constitution,”  Barnett said.

Barnett was one of the original litigants in the 2009 legal action Barnett, Alan Keyes v. Obama.

This new, current challenge is only one of the dozens that Mr. Obama is facing across the country regarding his failure to meet the Constitutional requirements for the Office of President of the United States.

Go here to view the complaint.   http://www.scribd.com/doc/78739896/California-Writ-to-Keep-Obama-Off-Ballot-Stop-Fund-Raising

For more info contact:

Edward Noonan

530-845-5186

And visit these websites.

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/minor-v-happersett-proof-obama-is-unlawful-president

http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

For more info contact:

 

Edward Noonan

530-845-5186

 

And visit these websites.

www.obamaballotchallenge.com

http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Only a natural born citizen can legally be President of the USA.  ”Obama” is not either. See: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Subscribe free to ObamaBallotChallenge.com. Please forward. See us on Facebook.

Ballot News Blog, California News, Uncategorized , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts

19 Comments

  1. [...] Breaking: CA Voters, including Presidential Candidate, Challenge Obama on California Ballot!-Posted on Obama Ballot Challenge-By GeorgeM-On January 19, 2012: [...]

    The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History! « A Nation ADrift-Why?, 1 year ago Reply

  2. [...] Breaking: CA Voters, including Presidential Candidate, Challenge … [...]

    Sitizens ballot | Mummabearcards, 1 year ago Reply

  3. I would like Mr. Edward Noonan to be specific as how the constitution translate the presidential oval office requirement, which is, only a natural born citizen to seek or hold the oval office as a president of the United States. In my opinion, Mr. Obama merit or qualify to continue holding the oval office as a president of the United States because he is a natural born citizen of the United States. It does not matter where his father came from neither his mother. I believed, the constitution does not mandate for both parents must be United States born citizens for Mr. Obama to qualify for the Oval Office. The constitution mandate that; the candidate must be United States born citizen to hold the oval office as a president of the United states.
    As a citizens of a great country, I believed we should all focus on important issues that has to do with our daily lives such as economy-jobs, education, health and security. These are the issues or areas that we faced difficulty challenge in our time today. I believed we should all united and work toward a common goal to bring this powerful great nation back on track.

    Amadu Kamara, 1 year ago Reply

    • Amadu: Obviously, you didn’t read or understand the filing, since it was rather explicit on why BHO is not a natural born citizen. Here are some Article II eligibility “Cliff Notes,” in case you don’t want to read the whole thing: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

      GeorgeM, 1 year ago Reply

    • You say we should focus on our problems and not on Obama’s ineligibility. But what you don’t understand is, if we don’t have Obama in office, we won’t have these problems! The easiest way to fix our problems is to get rid of him and make all that he’s done null and void.

      KBB, 1 year ago Reply

      • You are right on target, I think everything will pick up as soon as he leaves office. THE MAN IS A PLAGUE !

        A J Ayers, 1 year ago Reply

    • Amadu, you and I have been friends for many years. I knew you right after you came from Sierra Leone and before you became a citizen. We have strict rules in our constitution about our candidates for the office of POTUS. We demand that our POTUS has NO ALLEGIANCES to any other government or country. In your case, you will ALWAYS have a part of your heart in Sierra Leone… and too, your children will have ALWAYS have a piece of their heritage in your homeland. They are not natural born because you WERE NOT a citizen prior to your receiving citizenship to this country.

      And I can almost guarantee you that if I went to Sierra Leone and became a citizen there… I WOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THAT COUNTRY.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/President_of_Sierra_Leone
      Wikipedia states:

      “To be elected president of Sierra Leone, a candidate must gain at least 55 percent of the vote. If no candidate gets the 55 percent requirement, there will be a second-round runoff between the top two candidates with the most votes in the first round. For qualification to be elected President of Sierra Leone, the person must be a Sierra Leonean citizen by birth; should have attained the age of 40 years; should be a member of a political party; and should be able to speak and read the English language. ”

      As you can see here one must be “a Sierra Leonean citizen by birth.” So please tell me why it is okay for Sierra Leone to have special requirements for their president…but Americans cannot!

      Your friend,
      Edward C. Noonan
      President 2012

      Edward C. Noonan, 1 year ago Reply

  4. I hope the legal system still works for the people, so that the people don’t become disenchanted with the legal system.

    Joe, 1 year ago Reply

  5. It is heartening to know that at least some citizens of the United States are continuing to demand that the rule of law be followed in the country. Without that rule of law, in particular the Constitution of the United States of America, the country is subject to the rule of tyrants. And whether those tyrants be of the Left or the Right of the political scene, they are still tyrants; to be resisted by The People, who are the true sovereigns in the country. Not the despots running things today, and attempting to get away with their chicanery, via their obvious control of the Mainstream media.

    The People were warned by their Founding Fathers, that if they would not take on the responsibilities involved in being self-governed, they would end up being governed. That day has come. The People can still take their country back. But time is short. Congratulations to those behind this legal complaint in California, as in other states at this crucial time. We who were about to die salute you.

    Stan, 1 year ago Reply

  6. [...]  Other challenges to Obama’s eligibility have been filed in Alabama, New Hampshire, California, New Mexico, and many other states during the respective designated objection [...]

    Georgia Democrat Party Says Republicans Carrying Out “Political Tricks” Against Obama| The Post & Email, 1 year ago Reply

  7. Letter I received from Debra Bowen,Calif. Secretary of State. Dear Tina, Thankyou for your correspondence received January 12, 2012. We reviewed your complaint for evidence of any Election Code violations. Every complaint received by our office is carefully reviewed for evidence of any criminal violations. If there is probable cause for us to believe that an Elections or Penal Code has been violated, a case is opened. By the same token,if there is no apparent evidence of any violation, the complaint is rejected and the reporting party is informed. After reviewing the details of your complaint,there is insufficient evidence to open an investigation into this matter. Thakyou for bringing this matter to our attention. Sincerely,Election Fraud Investigation,Unit.

    tina, 1 year ago Reply

  8. as you can see,this will not fly with “We The People” quite a brush off they have going.

    tina, 1 year ago Reply

    • Tina- The responsibility of Bowen is to assure that those names that are placed on the ballot are qualified to be on the ballot. By her not following the requirements stated in the constitution, the oath she swore to defend, she is violating law. Therefore she is subject to prosecution of aiding and abetting in fraud. I may not be entirely correct, but in my opinion she is not doing her job and this is costly to “We the People”.

      Brian Dani, 1 year ago Reply

  9. [...] Our Strategic Partner This entry was posted in Barack Obama and tagged american independent party, petitioners, respondent by admin. Bookmark the permalink. [...]

    Our Strategic Partner | Vladimir Putin 2012, 1 year ago Reply

    • Cherrie,Thank you for your comments. Keep in mind, there are sifciepc laws that pertain to birth’s over-seas. The laws are different for U.S. citizens who are in the military stationed over seas and have a child, versus a U.S. citizen traveling over seas and giving birth. E.g., the Nationality Act of 1942 would pertain to Obama/Soetoro being born over-seas, his mother did not meet the residency requirements to pass on U.S. natural born citizenship status to Obama/Soetoro.

      Kenji, 7 months ago Reply

  10. [...] Indiana.  Other challenges to his candidacy have been filed in Missouri, New Hampshire, Illinois, California, New Mexico, and [...]

    Democrat Presidential Candidate Will Proceed with Eligibility Challenge Against Obama| The Post & Email, 1 year ago Reply

  11. If this haoppens to be the smoking gun that Americans have been searching for now for over 4 years then please let me know the caliber so I can get some more ammunition.

    Melvin E. Holliday, 7 months ago Reply

    • So far, the opposition has been bulletproof, even with overwhelming evidence that Obama has not shown any valid, legal proof of eligibility and court precedents that they must vet.

      GeorgeM, 7 months ago Reply


Post Your Comment

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE