Florida Voeltz v Obama Ballot Challenge Case Appealed
Posted by By GeorgeM at 21 September, at 01 : 05 AM Print
Yes, the case is still alive. Yes, Mike Voeltz is appealing it, with the able counsel of attorney Larry Klayman. It is important that we get ballot challenge news out to the public, since MSM alternately suppresses or distorts news of them. Obama has definitely NOT established his eligibility, in spite of multiple case dismissals.
read appeal: http://www.scribd.com/doc/106514978
Attorney Larry Klayman
1ST DCA Case No.: 1D12-3489
L.T. No.: 2012-CA-00467
Anatomy of a Florida Ballot Challenge
Florida Ballot Challenge News
Contribute to case expenses
Note to those of you who feel that there is no case, or that nothing will come of it:
- At this point, it is not highly likely that Obama will be thrown out of office on eligibility grounds. Could happen– and we have a strong case– but not likely.
So, then, why is it being done?
- Obama hasn’t submitted a shred of valid legal proof of eligibility for the presidency
Sounds shocking, outrageous? Sure, but …
1. Forged birth certificate on whitehouse.gov:
http://www.youtube.com/embed/CCVp7-7rdoM?feature=player_detailpage
http://www.youtube.com/embed/_3BITSkdFyw?feature=player_detailpage
2. His draft registration is forged:
http://constitutionalreset.ning.com/profiles/blogs/obama-s-fraudulent-selective-service-registration
3. He has used at least 16 stolen Social Security numbers, including the one he uses to get paid in the White House 042-68-4425:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-9QeJqSneA&feature=player_embedded
4. Even if he was born here, he ‘s not eligible, since his father was a foreigner and never a citizen. Learn something about Presidential eligibility:
http://art2superpac.com/issues.html
- The groundwork is being laid for future legal action which could: defend previous legal precedents which have been violated by electing and retaining “Obama” in office illegally/unconstitutionally; void actions taken in office.
and lastly:
- Inform citizens of ineligibility and felonies committed, to affect this years’s election.
As Fl ss. 102.168(1) (3) (b) shows, Florida electors have the right to challenge the eligibility of “ANY PERSON” whom is “NOMINATED OR ELECTED” to office.
Even if no primary is held, the unopposed candidate shall be considered “NOMINATED” for the office.
“101.252?Candidates entitled to have names printed on certain ballots; exception.—(1)?Any candidate for nomination who has qualified as prescribed by law is entitled to have his or her name printed on the official primary election ballot. However, when there is only one candidate of any political party qualified for an office, the name of the candidate shall not be printed on the primary election ballot, and such candidate shall be declared nominated for the office.”
Further, Federal Election statute (11 C.F.R. 100.2(C)(5)) says that the election is “considered to have occurred” if there is an unopposed major party candidate whom shall appear on the general election ballot. So Florida statutes agreee with Federal statutes.
Therefore by Fl. ss. 102.168(1)(3)(b) I have standing, and the Supreme Court of Fla. has said that “eleigibility is a judicial determination upon any challenge properly made” (Shevin v. Stone(1972))
My action is properly made as to time, indispensible parties, claimant status, and venue. Therefore this action is properly made, and the court is obliged to make a ruling as to the eligibility of Barack H. Obama
Mick, 8 months ago
If this is dismissed get a rope
Michael E. Rail, 8 months ago
It’s not a case of being “thrown out of office”.
It is a case of eligibility for the office sought, hence eligibility to appear on ballots.
John, 8 months ago
[...] the Article II Superpac, the Obama Ballot Challenge, the extensive legal work of many scholars, and many, many others have indicated. The 2009 Continental Congress recommended vetting laws at the [...]
Court Rules Natural Born Citizenship Required for Presidency « drkatesview, 7 months ago