Grinols CA Obama Election Class Action Challenge
Posted by By GeorgeM at 15 December, at 20 : 45 PM Print
No analysis on validity of this case. Just passing it along for your examination. Read more on Taitz site. We don’t recall seeing any previous class action suits.
- Seeking to protect public from election fraud and acknowledging that defendants cannot be adequately compensated for losing their rights to compete in Electoral College.
- Calls for stay of election/preliminary injunction, blocking electors from voting.
- Case cites probable Obama ineligibility, evidence of forged birth certificate, invalid SSN, foreign father, not using his legal name, E-Verify fail, 1.5 million invalid CA voter registrations, failure to establish eligibility and making fraudulent claims of eligibility.
IMPORTANT UPDATE!!! EASTERN DISTRICT OF CA GAVE US 7 DAYS TO FILE A A PETITION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER STAYING THE CERTIFICATION OF OBAMA’S ELECTION BY THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE. I WILL BE PREPARING ALL THE REQUIRED DOCUMENTS IN A RUSH ORDER. THIS ONE WEEK WILL BE VERY IMPORTANT!
Posted on | December 14, 2012 | 15 Comments
PRESS RELEASE
Law office of Dr. Orly Taitz
Plaintiff in Grinols et al v Electoral College et al were given 1 week to submit all the documents for the TRO (Temporary restraining order )staying the certification of the election. This one week will be extremely important and I need assistance of the public.
Part of the documents requested, is a notification to defendants and asking them if they will stipulate to TRO, meaning if they will agree. It is safe to believe that the electors, who are Democrats will not stipulate, however Republican electors will stipulate, will agree that Obama’s certification should I will be notifying the defendants through the Attorney Generals of the States but I need help from the public to reach each and every elector and have him/ her sign the STIPULATION to TRO
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
STIPULATION TO TRO
I _________________________Presidential Elector from the state of _____________________.
I received a copy of the complaint (30 pages) and exhibits (107 pages) Grinols et al v Electoral College et al. 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD U.S. District Court Eastern District of California
I received a copy of the docket of the case with an order by Judge on duty Kimberly Mueller giving plaintiffs one week to submit TRO (Temporary Restraining Order)
I understand that Plaintiffs are seeking Declaratory Relief deeming Barack Obama, aka Barack Soetoro aka Barack Soebarkah ineligible to the U.S. Presidency due to his use of a Connecticut Social Security number 042-68-4425, which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS, due to evidence of forgery in his alleged copy of his alleged birth certificate and due to evidence of forgery in his alleged copy of his alleged selective service certificate application and his use of a name not legally his. I understand that Plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief, prohibiting Barack Obama from being certified as a winner of the Presidential election for the same reasons. (complaint and order by Judge Mueller is posted on OrlyTaitzESQ.com)
I, ______________________________stipulate(agree) to TRO of certification of election results until this matter can be heard on the merits by the presiding judge.
I, ______________________________ do not stipulate(do not agree) to TRO of certification of election results until this matter can be heard on the merits by the presiding judge.
Signed________________________________________________________
Dated_________________________________________________________
ACTIVITY IN CASE 2:12-CV-02997-MCE-DAD GRINOLS ET AL V. ELECTORAL COLLEGE ET AL ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY
|
Inbox
|
x | |||

|
2:42 PM (10 minutes ago)
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
|
||||
This is an automatic e-mail message generated by the CM/ECF system. Please DO NOT RESPOND to this e-mail because the mail box is unattended. ***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** There is no charge for viewing opinions.
U.S. District Court
Eastern District of California – Live System
Notice of Electronic Filing
| Case Name: | Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al |
| Case Number: | 2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD |
| Filer: | |
| Document Number: | 8 |
Docket Text: ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/14/12 DENYING Plaintiffs’ [2] Request. If the parties wish to proceed with their request for a temporary restraining order, they are hereby ordered to file the documents listed in this order by 12/21/12. (Manzer, C)
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Orly Taitz   & nbsporly.taitz@gmail.com, dr_taitz@yahoo.com
2:12-cv-02997-MCE-DAD Electronically filed documents must be served conventionally by the filer to:
The following document(s) are associated with this transaction:
| Document description:Main Document Original filename:n/a Electronic document Stamp: [STAMP dcecfStamp_ID=1064943537 [Date=12/14/2012] [FileNumber=5875349- 0] [ |
US District Court
For the Eastern District of California
James Grinols, Robert Odden, in their capacity )Case #
as Presidential Electors ) Declaratory and lnjunctive
Edward C. Noonan, Thomas Gregory MacLeran,
) Relief
Keith Judd in their capacity as )Petition
for
candidates for the U.S. President ) Extraordinary Emergency Writ of
v Electoral College, President of the Senate, )Mandamus/ Stay of Certification
Governor of California, Secretary of State ) of votes for Presidential
of California, U.S. Congress, Barack Hussein ) Candidate Obama due to
Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, aka )elections fraud and his use of
Barack Obama Soebarkah, in his capacity as a ) invalid fiorged/ fraudulently
Candidate for the U.S.President in 2012 )obtained lDs
(petition for permanent injunction is pending)
Petitioners are seeking certification as class representatives and class action
certification
read more: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Grinols-complaint.pdf





I understand that Orly has quite a number of unfriends, and apparently doesn’t present her cases as well as might be desired; is, then, in the minds of some, her own worst enemy.
But she’s out there, doing things; and that’s basically what counts: keeping the issue alive. More power to her in that, say I.
Stan, 5 months ago
It’s not a class action unless and until the court cettifies the class and makes it a class action suit. Until then it is just an Orly suit and we know how well those are formulated.
Jeremy, 5 months ago