By Tony Dolz, Obamaballotchallenge.com
I was present at the press conference that took place at the Church on the Green in Sun City, Arizona on March 31, 2011.
Approximately 1200 were allowed to fill the room to capacity and many had to be turned away. Signatures were collected from 1092 who were required to be Arizonians. That petition contains a request that the state legislature pass a resolution requiring the Chairwoman of the Democrat National Committee, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, to submit proof of Constitutional eligibility for Barack Hussein Obama as a condition to have his name placed on the ballot. By state law, the resolution would not require the signature of the state governor, Janice Brewer, so we were told. Well enough; and we pray that it will come to pass.
In the meantime, today, Monday April 2nd, I read an email from Orly Taitz, the untiring and relentless attorney representing challengers and plaintiffs questioning in court Obama’s eligibility, forgeries, frauds and felonies. Although her efforts have no doubt given Obama, his regime and the media, that so much love and protect their Progressive son, many restless days and nights, she has invariably run into thick fortress walls of corruption and moats teaming with ferocious unrepentant liars running interference from the damning facts of serious Obama crimes.
I copy below the content of her email. Let me summarize my take on her warning from my arms length position on the matter.
Orly Taitz is fighting Obama crimes in several court venues around the country as we speak. Any one of these cases, if allowed to be honestly heard on the merits could, without a doubt, unseat the alleged usurper of the Presidency of the United States. Corrupt judges have prevented attorneys, like Dr. Taitz, from properly defending their cases on the merits.
Now, for the first time in over three years, a law enforcement agency has concluded that they have overwhelming probable cause to believe that Obama’s birth certificate “file” posted on the Whitehouse website and the 1980 Selective Service application “file” are both cut and paste digitally manufactured forgeries and fraud. In other words, no paper legitimate birth certificate exists, the evidence indicates.
The law enforcement agency is Sheriff Joe Arpaio Sheriff’s Office of Maricopa County, Arizona and the taxpayer cost free Cold Case Posse that conducted the investigation.
Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo, the lead investigator, have held two publicly open press conferences where they revealed in detail the preliminary findings of the investigation. The press conferences can be viewed and downloaded from the Internet in full including all closing remarks from Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo.
It is not Sheriff Arpaio or Mike Zullo’s intention, as I see it, to unseat Barack Obama. Their role and their goal is to investigate crimes that citizens in the community alleged have taken place and committed by Barack Obama; and if there is probable cause to see that the crimes are prosecuted in the proper venue.
Orly Taitz and other attorneys who now have active cases in court have asked Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo to testify, not about the ongoing aspects of their investigation, but simply to provide and affidavit and testify on the findings that they have already disclosed publicly in their two press conferences and interviews to the media. Both Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo said at their last press conference that they did not wish to provide affidavits or testify in court.
Orly Taitz makes convincing arguments why they should (see enclosed email from Orly Taitz).
Basically, this is a summary of her points:
There is no time to proceed with a legislative approach (based on the preliminary findings) because not enough state legislators have indicated, as of this time, that they will support it; and there is not enough time left before the election to win the majority support needed.
There is no indication that Governor Brewer would sign any bill that would cause the state to demand proof of eligibility.
It is highly unlikely that the DNC Chairwoman would submit proof of eligibility for Obama; and any legal action brought against her would be tied up in court until after the elections – too late.
The argument offered by Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo, that providing an affidavit or testifying in court limited to the preliminary findings would compromise the ongoing investigation is negated by the fact that the Sheriff and Mike Zullo have held two public press conferences, with presentation of evidence, on their preliminary findings and they do not believe this disclosure compromises the ongoing investigation.
Orly Taitz has offered the Sheriff and the chief investigator reimbursement for all travel and related expenses so that testifying in court would cost neither them nor the taxpayers any money.
Taitz argues that testimony from the only law enforcement agency in the country that has investigated and concluded that there is probable cause to prosecute would deal a fatal blow to the corrupt obstruction of justice that Taitz and other attorneys have encountered to date. Taitz makes the argument that only success with one of the active legal actions would be capable of preventing Obama from fraudulently running for re-election and exposing serious Obama crimes that will potentially land him a prison.
WHAT CAN WE DO?
Orly Taitz asks for three actions from citizens around the nation.
- Contact Sheriff Arpaio’s office and ask that he provide an affidavit on the preliminary findings of the Cold Case Posse and favorably respond to subpoena to testify in court.
- Contribute funds to Orly Taitz so that she can reimburse Sheriff Arpaio and Mike Zullo’s expenses and for legal expenses in general.
- Citizen must as soon as possible file complaints with Attorneys-General, District Attorneys, Sheriffs and Grand Juries armed with the affidavit provided by Sheriff Arpaio, once he provides that affidavit.
I do not speak for Orly Taitz or any other attorney with active cases, nor am I trained in the law. I highly admire Sheriff Arpaio, his deputies and investigators. This is simply my take based on the warnings and recommendation that I received today from Orly Taitz in my inbox. Please read it for yourself (below) and make up your own mind.
Thousand Oaks, California
|Submitted on 2012/04/02 at 3:21amhttp://www.westernjournalism.com/sheriff-joe-arpaio-march-31-press-conference-full-video/
From 1:47:00 to Approximately 1:49:00 it is explained that they have no intention of backing this information in court. The excuse given is “it’s an ongoing investigation…”. Sounds to me like it’s just a ruse to sell books.
Response from Orly
Yesterday, reportedly when asked why he is not willing to testify before the judge, Zullo stated that it is because the investigation is ongoing. (the video of the event is not available for some reason) He also stated that he wants to work on legislative option. This makes absolutely no sense. When the investigation is ongoing and police does not want to jeopardize the investigation, they do not talk at all. Arpaio and Zullo are talking and doing press conferences, WND publicity events, where they are raising donations through WND and promoting Joseph Farah’s WND and selling the book which was co-authored with Jerome Corsi, promoting Jerome Corsi and the book. They are not asked to reveal something new that they did not reveal before, which might jeopardize the investigation. They are asked to confirm to the judge under oath, what they already stated in two press conferences. To say that confirming under oath what they said in press conference is jeopardizing the investigation, makes as much sense as Obama posting his forgery on line, but refusing to present the original or a certified copy because of privacy concerns. What privacy? Jeopardize what? This is equal to treating the public as complete idiots.
Additionally, testifying under oath before the judge does not preclude the legislative effort. I traveled to AZ 4 times. I gave presentations to the tea party and met with the law makers there. I was assisting with the legislative push last year. It died when corrupt governor of AZ Jan Brewer refused to sign the bill. The Speaker of the House acted in unison with Brewer and cut the assembly short, so that the bill would not be reintroduced. This time there are less state reps and state senators willing to sign. Let’s suppose we push the bill through the house and state senate, what’s next? Do you believe Brewer will be less corrupt this year than the last year? This is not very likely. Even if Brewer signs, the bill is not likely to be effective for this election cycle. It takes long time to push the bill through the committees, 2 chambers of the state legislature an put it in front of the governor.
So the only way to stop the criminal now, is through the order by a judge. In order for a judge to rule on the evidence it has to be in front of him. Arpaio is saying that he is continuing his investigation. Let’s not forget that he and Zullo and his posse did not come up with any news evidence. 3 years ago I submitted to authorities the report about the selective service certificate fraud I received from a retired agent Steven Coffman. For a year I have been submitting to courts evidence of forgery in Obama’s long form BC. So why did it take a year to confirm evidence, which was readily available? Why Arpaio is not talking about the SSN fraud, which is the easiest to confirm and which is the most damning? Why Arpaio and Zullo are talking before crowds in publicity events, but are not willing to state the same before a judge?
I am very concerned about the fact that Arpaio is facing charges by the feds for civil rights violations and is supposed to respond before April 14th. Testimony in court is the ace in his deck. I am really concerned that there might be a quid pro quo, a deal where the feds will leave Arpaio alone, but under a condition that he and his assistants never testify in court and either do not submit an official report to the District Attorney or submit one with the understanding that it would never lead to any charges, meaning a report that will be shelved by the District Attorney or the judge.
Please, urge Arpaio and Zullo and members of their team to do something that really makes a difference: submit their report asap to the District Attorney and testify in court confirming what they already stated at their publicity events. We do not need to know the name of the forger in order to remove Obama from the ballot. It is irrelevant and can be prosecuted later. They simply need to confirm before the judge in court what they stated before, that the alleged birth certificate is a forgery.
Please, do not forget that they are not risking anything. They are acting as witnesses, who were simply called to testify. I am the one facing all the challenges as I am the plaintiff or an attorney for plaintiffs. Corrupt establishment attacked me before, a corrupt judge hit me with $20,000 sanctions, saying it was frivolous to challenge usurper Obama,I was defamed, slandered and it continues. I carry all the expenses. Please, see the notice sent to Zullo. I even offered to pay for his expenses. They do not have a legitimate excuse not to testify before a judge and not to confirm under oath what they stated at the publicity events before.
Additionally, you can go to the DA and grand jury and demand they act upon evidence that was already made public. If Arpaio reaches a quid pro quo deal with the feds, you can still act by asking the county state and federal grand juries to act. Grand juries, state representatives, District Attorneys and Attorney Generals have subpoena power. They can subpoena Obama and the director of Health of Hawaii and the commissioner of Social Security. Please, go to the grand juries, District Attorneys and sheriffs in every county around the country. We know the regime is corrupt, but we may have one decent grand jury somewhere, which will present the indictment of Obama to the judge. I am conducting multiple legal actions hoping for one honest decent judge. Please, act, don’t rely only on Arpaio. Please, help me bring the evidence to judges and courts. I. also, need an assistant to help me copy and ship documents to secretaries of state and AGs, I need members of the public to help cover the expenses of shipping the packages.
Notice to appear
Dear investigator Zullo,
please find a notice to appear at the court hearing in Jackson MS on April 16, 2012 in Taitz v Democratic party, Secretary of State of MS
Please, advise me if you need airfare and hotel covered
Dr Orly TaitzESQ
IN THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT
Case #2012-107V )
Democratic Party of Mississippi
Notice to appear as a witness
Investigator Mike Zullo is hereby noticed to appear as a witnessed at the hearing Orly Taitz v Democratic Party of Mississippi, Secretary of State of Mississippi.
Hearing will be conducted at the Hinds County Circuit Court, 316 S. President str. Jackson, Mississippi, 39201 on April 16, 2012, 9 am, in front of the special judge R. Kenneth Coleman appointed by the chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the state of Mississippi to hear the aforementioned case.
You are to provide testimony and any and all evidence related to investigation of elections fraud and forgery of the long form birth certificate of Barack Hussein Obama, forgery of the Selective Service Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama and foreign national status of Barack Hussein Obama.
/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ