Injunction filed against head of Alabama Democratic Party to stay Obama off ballot until eligibility can be proven

Posted by By at 11 January, at 04 : 06 AM Print

IN THE 10TH Judicial Circuit Court of Jefferson County, State of Alabama
Birmingham Division

Harold Sorensen § CIVIL ACTION NO. CV201200023 §
Plaintiff, §
§
V. §
§
Mark Kennedy, Chairman of the §
Alabama Democratic Party, §
§
Defendant. §

AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
I Harold Sorensen, being first sworn, say:
1. I am the Plaintiff in the above-entitled action, and I make this Affidavit in support of my Motion for a Preliminary Injunction.

2. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated in this Affidavit, and, if called as a witness, I could testify competently to them.

3. Under Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States, it is stated: “No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) Ex Parte Lockwood, 154 U.S. 116 (1894) (aka In Re Lockwood at Justia), is essentially the holy grail of support for Minor v. Happersett, as it states: “In Minor v. Happersett, 21 Wall. 162, this court held that the word ‘citizen’ is often used to convey the idea of membership in a nation, and, in that sense, women, if born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction of the United States, have always been considered citizens of the United States, as much so before the adoption of the fourteenth amendment of the constitution as since…” (Emphasis added.) “This court held” is proof that 20 years after Minor v. Happersett, the Supreme Court was citing Minor as precedent for the definition of federal citizenship, such definition relying upon a construction of Article 2 Section 1 – the “natural born Citizen” clause – which implies that Candidate Obama is not eligible to be POTUS as his father, Barack Obama, Sr., was a British Subject at the time of his birth and NOT a citizen of the United States. Furthermore, the Lockwood court included Justice Horace Gray who wrote the infamous opinion in U.S. v Wong Kim Ark (which also cites the natural-born citizen passage of Minor as precedent – 169 U.S. 649, 680 (1898)) – albeit not in such a direct manner as Lockwood). And Lockwood had nothing at all to do with voting rights.

4. In one fast swoop, upon the discovery of Lockwood, the war against Minor’s relevance had been won. Minor is, beyond question, precedent on the definition of federal citizenship. And it has never been overruled as in 1982 it was cited by the Supreme Court – in City of Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980) –– as continuing precedent for its holding on voting rights as well. Candidate Barack Hussein Obama, II is not a natural born citizen and is not qualified to be on the ballot as a Presidential candidate in 2012. In 2008, when Candidate Mr. Obama ran for the U.S. presidency, he was never vetted and he never provided any documentary evidence of his natural born status. In fact The National Democratic Party in 2008 NEVER certified to the State of Alabama or the other 48 States that Candidate Barack Hussein Obama II was Constitutionally eligible for the Office of President of the United States. On January 20, 2009 as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution Candidate Obama took an Oath of Office:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
If Candidate Obama was not eligible for Office of the President of the United States upon taking that “Oath” he committed usurpation, perjury and misprision of felony. It is now imperative that Candidate Obama prove he is Constitutionally eligible for the 2012 Election Cycle.

Obama Ballot Challenge Alabama

Alabama News, Ballot News Blog , , , , ,

Related Posts

2 Comments

  1. I wish people would stop pusing Minor v Happersett and move on to the 14th amendment and the debates leading up to it’s passage. That is where the proof is!

    KenyanBornObama, 3 months ago Reply

  2. [...] Injunction filed against head of Alabama Democratic Party to stay Obama off ballot until eligibility…!-Posted on Obama Ballot Challenge–By unlawful-ON January 11, 2012: [...]

    The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History! « A Nation ADrift-Why?, 3 months ago Reply


Post Your Comment

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE