Letter to AZ Secretary of State Ken Bennett
Posted by By GeorgeM at 9 August, at 23 : 54 PM Print
Above: Tom Ballantyne, Author, Political Activist
.
Many of you are aware of Ken Bennetts’s cowardly actions during the ballot challenges and Arpaio Cold Case Posse revelations. He doesn’t deserve to ever be Governor, as he aspires to be, or even Dog-Catcher, for that matter.
.
.
AZ Ballot Challenge…. 
8-9-12
| From | Tom Ballantyne |
| To | Bennett, Ken kbennett@azsos.gov |
Dear Ken,
With the recent revelations from Sheriff Arpaio’s (ongoing) Investigation, and the apparent concurrence of the Indiana Court, it is beyond dispute (and there has been none of which I am aware – aside from attacking the Sheriff, Mike Zullo, and me) that the birth certificate for which you sought “verification” is a clear forgery – a digital creation.
Given that you no doubt watched the Press Conference with great interest, Ken, you are now aware that some 300 independent tests were made by each of two separate digital document experts, to see if they could replicate the image at whitehouse.gov through the process of scanning a document and applying OCR, Optimization, etc., to it. They were, of course – as previously demonstrated – unable to do so.
You are also, of course, aware that in his response, Alvin Onaka did not say that the image on the website (a copy of which you reportedly supplied him) was identical to that in their files. Rather, he stated that the “information on the whitehouse.gov website was the same as the information in the HI DOH files. Surely, Ken, as an intelligent person, you could not have failed to note this distinction. You also cannot have failed to grasp that in the legal sense, this distinction is of undeniable relevance.
In the end, Ken, while you shockingly accepted this as “proof positive” that the document was legitimate, now that we know, as a result of Sheriff Arpaio’s findings, resulting from 9 1/2 months of exhaustive investigation (and it was clear before this most recent Press Conference) that the document is NOT legitimate – taking the clearly-parsed word(s) of Alvin Onaka over the completely straightforward evidence of the Sheriff whose office is only blocks from your own – how can you possibly pretend that you are satisfied that candidate Obama is eligible?
It is obvious to all observers, Ken, that you cannot – except that you have simply sought to wash your hands of this responsibility. You had (have) the opportunity to honor your oath of office (in defense of both your children and grandchildren, about whose future you say you are greatly worried), by simply requiring that Onaka honor your request to verify ALL of the facts of candidate Obama’s birth – starting with the birth date. Incredibly, from his “verification,” you (we) can’t even know if he meets the Constitutional age requirement, much less the requirement that he be born here (in the U.S.) of two citizen parents. Surely you are aware that in Mr. Onaka’s response (“verification”) he incredibly failed to confirm (verify) either Obama’s gender, birth date, birth city, birth island, or his father or mother!
All of those on this thread, and tens of thousands more (millions nationwide) eagerly await your response, Ken. While Morgan Loew and others of his persuasion (clear bias) may disparage those citizens who have the audacity to demand that the Constitution be followed, true Americans can see through his absurd arrogance and ignorance. Hopefully you can as well, Ken.
We have not ceased caring about this issue, just because you have chosen to bow to the pressure of the increasingly-obsolete establishment media and the rabid supporters of candidate Obama – both of whom seem to care little for the truth. (Those of us who do would be equally – if not more – outraged if the Republicans were to nominate the Constitutionally-ineligible Marco Rubio as vice-president.) The only thing that should matter to you, Ken, is upholding your oath to “support and defend the Constitution …against all enemies, foreign and domestic, so help [you] God.” After that, it’s okay to care about both current and future generations of Americans as well – including your own progeny for whom you say that you so greatly worry!
Sincerely,
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, cases are still active– need your help NOW!
Support the Florida and Other Ballot Challenges!
Constitution Action Fund
Even if you don’t donate, at least click and read the above.
What is the Article II Legal Defense Fund? Find out.
Only a natural born Citizen can legally be President of the USA. ”Obama” is not either.
Subscribe free to ObamaBallotChallenge.com. Please forward. We’re also on Facebook
sent today:
kbennett@azsos.gov
SOS Bennett:
I have written you before on this. Your conduct during and after the efforts of the Patriotic ballot challengers and investigators was disgraceful. These were not the actions of a real patriot. You ignored the evidence and took what you may think was the easy way out, but you didn’t follow the law, didn’t do what was right — and we won’t make it easy for you. Nor will unfolding events. In case you haven’t noticed, we are gaining momentum– because we are determined– but also because we are right and more and more people are learning about it.
I sent Tom Ballantyne’s letter to you to thousands of my “closet friends,” many of whom are activists, many of whom have an interest in the AZ elections, many of whom l have lonnnnng memories.
There is a rather short window of opportunity for you to reverse direction by September and help us with work on the Obama ineligibility. Start by waking up and actually examining the damning evidence, which we know was sent to you. Reopen the inquiry, cooperate with Arpaio’s group, Ballantyne, the Tea Party, Ken Allen, etc. Let’s stop this ineligible usurper cold. Do not rely upon the election to do the job, since you Republicans are so incompetent and your opposition is so sneaky and owns the media. We also need to reverse damaging precedents and set the stage for future actions to get our country and Constitution back. Get word to the public that you have reconsidered, that you have seen new evidence, whatever it takes– but get moving, while we still have a country — and you still have a job.
Regards,
George Miller
http://obamaballotchallenge.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
GeorgeM, 10 months ago
Look how the media and establishment pols are attacking Tom! Shows that he is drawing blood
http://www.kpho.com/story/18996494/conspiracy-peddlers-influence-az-sec-of-state
http://www.kpho.com/category/238096/arpaio-investigation-of-obamas-birth-certificate
GeorgeM, 10 months ago
GeorgeM and Tom , Please stay the course in defense of the US Constitution . We The People need more patriots like you in order to save this constitutional republic .
Thank You Again
Charles S. Imwold
Baltimore ,Maryland
charles17121, 10 months ago
Tom, here are a few tips you can use in your next letter:
(1) A quick count shows that in the course of seven paragraphs, you managed to unnecessarily repeat Bennett’s first name seven times. This one-to-one ratio is good, but still not enough. Remember, if the recipient of a persuasive letter forgets his own name halfway through reading it, he will also probably forget that he’s the one who is supposed to be persuaded by the letter in the first place.
2. Speaking of paragraphs, if you find you’ve written one that consists entirely of a single sentence, that’s usually a great sign either that your paragraph is too short, or your sentence is way too long. In your case, trust me, it’s the latter.
3. A neat trick that not many people know: If, in the middle of typing one thought, you have ANOTHER thought, you don’t immediately have to insert an em dash and type the second thought. It’s possible that the second thought is irrelevant or redundant; this means that you don’t need to type it at all. But even if this isn’t the case, you can wait until you’ve finished the first thought, and then type the second one in its own sentence! As a bonus, you’ll be surprised at how much this approach helps address (2).
(Redacted), 10 months ago