More Ballot Challenges from the Land Of Enchantment (NM)

Posted by By at 20 January, at 22 : 47 PM Print

More Ballot Challenges from the Land Of Enchantment (NM)

NM Patriot Charles Revie  informs me of more challenges. Previous ones can be viewed HERE.  It seems that there are dozens of challenges nationwide that we don’t even know about and some we know about, but have various reasons for not publishing at this time.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Complaint of Charlie Revie:

Governor Martinez and Secretary Duran,

= = = 286 words = = =

You both should recall my earlier advisory to you to keep Barak Obama off the 2012 New Mexico ballot in his bid for 2nd term as the US President because he is not a “natural born citizen” as defined in 1875 by the US Supreme Court in the case of Minor v Happersett.  Simply stated that definition requires, regardless of child’s birth place, both parents to be US Citizens at the time of birth.

There is mounting evidence that at least three other Presidential candidates, regardless of political party, also are not “natural born citizens.”  That being the case, I strongly urge you to require all Presidential candidates to unequivocally prove both parents were US Citizens when they were born and that the Candidates, themselves are “natural born citizens” and are otherwise qualified the candidate is qualified under the Constitution.

The US Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, Paragraph 5, specifically states that only a only a “natural-born” citizen shall be eligible for the presidency.  Because the Vice President is the immediate successor, the VP must also be a “natural born citizen.” We must assure that every candidate, regardless of party affiliation, is in compliance.  Candidates should be required to show a certified copy of their birth certificate, provide their social security number, proof of both parents’ citizenship, and any other data deemed appropriate. For too many years we have not properly qualified candidates to be placed on the ballot. It is time to change our certification procedures and make sure we have done a job worthy of the candidates and the electorate.

Please consider this plea on behalf of the people of New Mexico, and the people of the United States.

Thank you for your consideration.

 

Charlie Revie
Las Cruces, NM

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Obama Is Not Natural Born US Citizen

 

=== 287 words ===

 

I question Barak Obama’s status as a “natural born US Citizen” based on some obvious flaws in his Certificate of Live Birth as released on Apr 25, 2011, and showing his date of birth as Aug 4, 1961.  For instance …

1.  The name of the hospital is shown as “Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital” when that name did not come into existence until 1978.  This is validated by the hospital’s own web page at http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx

2.  His father’s race is indicated as “African” rather than “Negro” and his mother’s race is indicated as “Caucasian” rather than “White.”  “Negro” and “White” were universally used until “African” and “Caucasian” became politically correct with the civil rights movement.

3.  His place of birth is listed as “Kenya, East Africa.”  Kenya did not exist until Dec 1963 when it declared independence as the “Dominion of Kenya” with the Queen of England as head of state; in Dec 1964 it re-declared itself as the “Republic of Kenya” with its own head of state.  When Obama was born, Kenya was properly known as “British East Africa.”

4.  He is not a “natural born citizen” of the United States.  In 1875 the US Supreme Court, in the case of Minor v. Happerstett, ruled that a “natural born US citizen” is a person born of parents who are both US Citizens, regardless of child’s place of birth.  If his father were a naturalized US citizen, then this issue would be moot.

I am not sure how we could go about keeping Obama off the ballot as the data  are quite convincing that he is not eligible for the office of President.  We elected an imposter in 2008, let’s not repeat the mistake in 2012.

Charlie Revie

Las Cruces, NM

= = ========================================================

Complaint of Jerry B. Clark:

January 9, 2012

 

Mrs. Dianna J. Duran
New Mexico Secretary of State
325 Don Gaspar, Suite 300
Santa Fe, NM 88503

Phone: (505) 827-3600

Dear Mrs. Duran:

I am a lifelong resident of New Mexico and have been a voter in New Mexico elections since 1966.  I have not followed the process carefully until the last 5 years.  Since then, I have become more interested in governance and have started to pay attention to the election process.  There have been many media comments on fraudulent voting in New Mexico and I would like to add my voice to this issue and to submit an administrative complaint concerning fraudulent ballots issued in 2008 and the similar possibility in 2012.

The 2008 (2012) New Mexico Candidate Guide and the 2008 (2012) Election Handbook provide the instructions by which our candidates are qualified and are presented on the ballots issued by the Secretary of State.

The 2008/2012 New Mexico Election Handbook defines who may be a candidate for President:

Specific Eligibility Requirements and duties

On page 13/15 for the 2008/2012 Candidate Guides

President of the United States

In addition to the general requirements, to serve as President of the United States, a person:

·      Must be a natural born citizen

·      Must be a resident within the United States for fourteen years; and

·      Must be at least thirty-five years of age. (U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 1)”

The certification by the then Democratic Party and the then Governor and the then Secretary of State allowed a fraudulent candidate to be presented to the voters of New Mexico as a valid certified candidate.  This candidate Barack H. Obama has since released a “certified” long form birth certificate that indicates his father was a citizen of Kenya (a British protectorate) making him a British Citizen.  This self-admission violates not only New Mexico candidate qualifications; it also violates the qualifications listed in the United States Constitution (Article 2 Section 1) requiring candidates to be born of two American citizens (natural born citizen).

Attached you will find an Administrative Complaint—Procedure Title 1 Chapter 10 Part 18 as required by the New Mexico Secretary of State.  You will also find a historical basis for the definitions of “natural born citizenship”, also listed are Supreme Court decisions validating the definition of “natural born citizenship” and a petition with individuals wishing to be listed as co-complainants.  Each individual is a registered voter of New Mexico.

Please accept this complaint, as we wish to assure the people of New Mexico that the ballots presented to them are properly vetted and certified by the presenting political parties, the Secretary of State, and the Governor of New Mexico.  In 2012, this same candidate or other candidates will be presented for inclusion on the Presidential Ballot.  The political parties cannot present a candidate that is not certifiable under the New Mexico Candidate Guide or the Constitution of the United States.  Nor can the Secretary of State present such candidates to the Governor of New Mexico for the ballot proclamation.  The voters must believe that we are a state that upholds our own laws and the United States Constitution.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jerry B. Clark

 

Description of Complaint—As a New Mexico voter I was presented with a false candidate on the 2008 Presidential ballot due to failure of the New Mexico Secretary of State to assure compliance with New Mexico and Federal laws governing the qualifications for President of the United States.  The 2012 Presidential Ballot will repeat the fraud of 2008 unless remedies are taken.

 

Basis of Complaint

 

The New Mexico Secretary of State has the responsibility for oversight of the entire election process.

 AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE IN THIS MATTER

 

 

2.     Pursuant to 2011 NMSA 1978 1-2-1, you are the Chief Election Officer, you oversee the entire election process:

 

a.  NMSA 1978 1-2-1.  Secretary of State; Chief Election Officer; rules; enforcement power.

 

b.    According to the NM Secretary of State’s website, “The Secretary of State oversees the entire election process…”

 

To insure compliance with municipal, state, and federal laws the Secretary of State publishes an Election Guide and a Candidate Handbook to provide direction to parties, candidates, and voters.

The candidate guides for 2008 and 2012 are identical in their description of the candidate qualifications required to be listed on the Presidential ballot:

 

Specific Eligibility Requirements and Duties

2008 Candidates Handbook page 13

2012 Candidates Handbook page 15

 

for the President

must be a natural born citizen;

must be a resident within the United States for fourteen years; and

must be at least thirty-five years of age. (U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 1)

 

This statement places New Mexico law in compliance with Article 2 Section 1 of the United States Constitution:

 

No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

 

 

President Obama released his long form birth certificate, which stated his father was born in Kenya, East Africa making him either a Kenyan citizen or a British citizen not an American Citizen.  This documented verification of his father’s citizenship causes the natural born citizenship requirement to be failed.

 

As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.’s children:

 

British Nationality Act of 1948 (Part II, Section 5): Subject to the provisions of this section, a person born after the commencement of this Act shall be a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies by descent if his father is a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies at the time of the birth.

 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate

 

 

 

What is the historical precedence to define “natural born citizen”?

Our U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) held that women, while being citizens of the U.S., do not have the right to vote under the Constitution. Of course, we know that this law was later repudiated. In discussing who are citizens of the United States and whether women may be such citizens, the Court explains that we did not need the Fourteenth Amendment to create U.S. citizens. It explains that before the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Constitution itself did not prescribe what a citizen was. While the Court does not cite The Law of Nations, the Court goes into concepts, which can be found in that treatise. The concepts of “nation,” “political community,” “association of persons for the promotion of their general welfare,” and “member of the nation formed by the association” are all concepts that are found in E. de Vattel’s, The Law of Nations (1758). The Court then says that each person so associated with the community was a member of that community and owed that community his allegiance. The Court says that citizens were then those persons who “associated themselves together to form the nation” and who were later admitted as members of that nation. The Court then explains that an individual’s wanting to ban together with others to form the new nation was actually that person’s allegiance to the new nation. The Court continues that it was the individual’s giving of this allegiance to the cause of creating the new nation that made that individual a citizen of that nation. The Court explains that for his allegiance, the person received the protection of the nation (calling these reciprocal obligations). Finally, the Court comments that any person who participated and helped in politically separating the new nation from Great Britain and in the military cause against that nation became a citizen at the time the Constitution was adopted. The Court explains that anyone who was part of these people at the time of the drafting of the Constitution were the “original citizens” of the U.S.

The Court then says that citizenship would not be limited to only this original category, for the Constitution at Article II provided for allowing more citizens to be created by birth and in the clause giving Congress the power to establish uniform rules of naturalization by naturalization. The Court then tells us that the Constitution does not define what a “natural born Citizen” is. The Court then said the following in explaining what a “natural born Citizen” is:

At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country, of parents who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient, for everything we have now to consider, that all children, born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction, are themselves citizens.” Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168.

 

This test was affirmed in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U. S. 649, 18 S.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. 890 (1898).

Article II of the Constitution provides that “[n]o person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the Office of President . . ..” From the Minor decision, we learn who the Framers placed in the second category as being eligible to be President. These were the “original citizens,” those who were members of and who gave their allegiance to the revolutionary cause that produced the new nation. The Framers grandfathered these individuals to be eligible to be President. There cannot be any doubt that even children who were born on U.S. soil fell into this category simply because they were the first generation of citizens. It is interesting to note that Jane Randolph Jefferson (1720-1776), President Thomas Jefferson’s mother, was born in the Tower Hamlets of Shadwell, a maritime neighborhood of London, England, and came to Virginia when she was young. With the passing of time, no one would be able to benefit from the grandfather clause and then would have to be “natural born Citizens” to be eligible to be President. We learn that “all children born in the country of parents who were its citizens. . . ” make up the “natural born Citizen” category. The Court says that there have never been any doubts as to the status of these children. As to children born in the U.S. to parents who were not U.S. citizens at the time of their birth, there have been doubts. In other words, “natural born Citizen” under this formulation requires two generations of U.S. citizens, one generation in the parents and the other in the child himself/herself who also must be born on U.S. soil. It is important to understand that we are focusing on what is a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, which specifies the requirements to be President, and not on what a “Citizen” is under the 14th Amendment or under some Congressional Act, which does not relate to Article II natural born Citizenship.

 

Conclusion

 

In 2008, this qualification was violated because The Democratic Party of New Mexico certified that their candidate, Barack H. Obama, met the required standards.   They submitted a false certification of this candidate, which allowed an unqualified candidate to be placed on the New Mexico federal ballot.

 

Similarly, the New Mexico Secretary of State Mary Herrera, also violated New Mexico elections code and allowed this unqualified candidate to be placed on the New Mexico federal ballot. (Ref: NM Election Handbook 2011   Certification 1-19A-6  (3) QUALFIED as a candidate PURSUANT to other APPLICABLE STATE ELECTION LAW;

 

 

The alleged violator(s) was either the Democratic Party of New Mexico or the New Mexico Secretary of State Mary Herrera.

 

The violation of the New Mexico Candidate Guide, New Mexico Election Guide, and the United States Constitution allowed an illegal candidate to be placed on the New Mexico ballot.

 

A future violation of the same New Mexico code will occur if this or any other unqualified candidate is placed on the 2012 Presidential ballot.

 

I ask that the New Mexico Secretary of State investigate this complaint and if the complaint is found to be valid to remove Barack H. Obama from New Mexico Presidential ballot for 2012.   I would also request that legislation be put into place to assure that the fraud of 2008 never again will occur.  The Secretary of State is vested with the authority to assure that the voters of New Mexico have the opportunity to vote for candidates with no possibility of fraud.  The Secretary of State has the responsibility to fix the conditions that occurred in 2008.  Thank you for consideration of this complaint.

 

Attached to this complaint are 5 items

Item 1—Cover Letter to the New Mexico Secretary of State

Item 2—Complaint Description

Item 3—Historical basis for definition of “natural born citizen”

http://people.mags.net/tonchen/birthers.htm

Item 4—Supreme Court Decisions   http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=3016

Item 5—List of co-signers (all co-signers are registered voters in New Mexico)

 

Jerry B. Clark

===========================================================

 

Here’s a fine site by NM Conservative Libertarians: http://lcsonsofliberty.com/?p=939

See our New Mexico page

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Don’t miss the historic Georgia hearings next Thursday- see our Georgia page.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Only a natural born citizen can legally be President of the USA.  ”Obama” is not either. See: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html

Subscribe free to ObamaBallotChallenge.com. Please forward. We’re also on Facebook

Ballot News Blog, New Mexico News , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Related Posts

2 Comments

  1. Barack Obama is not elegible to be President. He is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution the 14th Amendment. This is our law and this man has disregarded our laws and the constitution. He should not be on any ballot for President in this nation. His records are not available and he violated another law by not appearing in court in Georgia. The court acted and he is not elegible to be on Georgia’s ballot. It is my sincere hope that the will of the people be done in New Mexico and all other states. That is that the man Barack H. Obama will not be elegible for any ballot in the country unless he proves his citizenship and comes clean about an illegal Social Security Card. Another violaton of law. This is enough. He is a communist and he is trying to destroy this nation. Make sure he is not on your ballot.

    David Hudson, 3 months ago Reply

  2. [...] Other challenges to his candidacy have been filed in Missouri, New Hampshire, Illinois, California, New Mexico, and [...]

    Democrat Presidential Candidate Will Proceed with Eligibility Challenge Against Obama| The Post & Email, 2 months ago Reply


Post Your Comment

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE