Posted by By GeorgeM at 29 September, at 00 : 44 AM
Print
Above: Author/political activist Tom Ballantyne, 5/31/12, addressing Ventura County Tea Party on “Obama”
Things are heating up lately in Arizona. You may be wondering why we are leaning so hard on Arizona officials, compared to say, those in California or Illinois, who are far worse– hopeless even. The reason we are talking to Arizonans is that we believe they are among the most potentially receptive and the populace most likely to insist upon action.
Dear Attorney Montgomery,
I appreciate that you responded to my letter. I assume from your response that there is no such thing as a county grand jury. Is that correct?
Meanwhile, Bill, I must ask you what the matter of “politics” has to do with this? As I may have referenced in my letter, every depiction of Lady Justice with which I am familiar shows her to be blindfolded. We all understand the significance of that.
I find it tragically ironic that nearly every official in the country before whom this matter has come – and I would include the Republican members of Congress and our own State Legislature in that group – has shied away from this critical Constitutional matter in order to “not be (or appear) political.” Once again, the law knows or makes no such distinction.
As for your jurisdiction, I would ask, Bill, if you have examined the evidence that the Sheriff has uncovered. As you may be aware, I have written a book in excess of 620 pages on the subject, and the evidence was so extensive that I ultimately divided it into two separate books. In it I cover the applicable HRS (Hawaii Revised Statutes) in detail, and I am therefore more familiar than most with the extent of both the fraud and the cover-up. Both are unprecedented, and millions around the world know this.
So given the uncontested evidence (or proof) provided by Sheriff Arpaio, why have you not sought to find legal avenues through which to exercise your authority on behalf of the citizens of Maricopa County? If you are aware that a crime has been committed (I have attached the recent letter from Attorney Larry Klayman to Bob Bauer, General Counsel to the DNC), should/would you not seek to do everything within your authority to see that justice is served, rather than simply saying that you can do nothing?
In case you are unaware of the fact, Bill, the proof and evidence that the highest office in the land has been usurped is overwhelming, and nearly every official in the country has stated, as you just have, that“I can [or will] do nothing about it.” Your oath of office, sworn before God and the People, requires that you find a way to defend the Constitution and the Rule of Law.
Sincerely,
Tom Ballantyne – Author and AZ/U.S. Citizen
P.S. I have copied all of those copied on my recent letter to Attorney General Tom Horne, as all are keenly interested in both his and your responses. I will copy many additional Tea Party Leaders in the state as well. In spite of the media attacks on those who believe in the Rule of Law (not a “political” thing with us, and many are Independents, not Republicans or Democrats), the majority of the People continue to state that they do not (for they can not) know if their Commander in Chief was born here or not (which still would not make him a Natural-born Citizen). No honest observer can deny the evidence, clearly visible to all.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Montgomery Bill <
Montgomw@mcao.maricopa.gov> wrote:
Dear Mr. Ballantyne,
I noted you were on the return email list for the email sent by George Miller so I’ll only address the points you raised that I did not cover in my response to Mr. Miller.
Why is it that you have not formed a grand jury in order to bring charges against him and the DNC who has fraudulently certified him? Because I do not have the authority to empanel a State Grand Jury.
There is only one answer, Bill, and that is that you and every other public official in the country (apparently) are afraid to enforce the law and stand up for (“support and defend”) the Constitution, as you have sworn an oath to do. God will not be mocked, however, nor will we the People who hired and now pay you. I was one of them, and I and tens of thousands of other AZ citizens are awaiting the fulfillment of your oath “so help [you] God.”
I respectfully disagree with your conclusion. I fear no one on God’s green earth. However, I will not assert authority where I do not have it. That is as much an important principle in the exercise of the powers of a prosecutor as the principle to vigorously pursue a case where the evidence permits and justice warrants. I will not mix politics and prosecution.
Sincerely,
Bill Montgomery
Maricopa County Attorney
–
Tom Ballantyne – Author
Arizona News, Ballot News Blog
Keep the pressure up fellow patriot! Many millions stand with you!
Check out http://www.historyinsidepictures.com/Pages/MountRushmoreThenandNow.aspx somtime.
Larry Brian Radka, 7 months ago
Vote every incumbent out in November. They are complicit in this treason that is being perpetrated.
PeoplePower, 7 months ago
So, if a citizen (not the usurper) presented a forged colb, a SS# that belonged to someone else, and a forged selective service registration card they would not be procecuted? OK, makes sense.
PeoplePower, 7 months ago
IT SEEMS THAT NO ONE IN THE USA HAS THE AUTHORITY OR THE BALLS TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION THEY SWORE TO UPHOLD,GOD HELP US!!
Billy Norton, 7 months ago
b. Make the System Simple. The identification system should be simple but it should permit the prosecutor to determine the source of the evidence and how it was obtained (i.e., whether the evidence was in response to a grand jury subpoena and, if so, which subpoena). The identification system also should permit the prosecutor to determine what use the grand jury made of the evidence: what evidence generally was made available to the grand jury, what evidence was physically offered and made available to the grand jury, and what evidence was entered as an exhibit or otherwise formally presented to the grand jury.
dieta, 7 months ago
From Brian Reilly ….
George:
In regards to Tom Ballantyne’s open letter to Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery, here are two Arizona Revised Statutes that cover “Grand Jury.” Note that the county prosecuting attorney may petition for additional county grand juries. Also, upon the application by the state attorney general a state grand jury may be impaneled with statewide jurisdiction. I thought you might find this helpful. Thanks.
Regards,
Brian Reilly
A.R.S. 21-402. Calling grand jury
A. In a county with a population of two hundred thousand persons or more a grand jury shall be called every four months each year by the presiding judge of the superior court. Each grand jury shall sit until a new grand jury has been impanelled to replace it or until its term expires pursuant to section 21-403. Additional grand juries shall be called on petition of the county attorney stating the reasons therefor.
B. In a county with a population of less than two hundred thousand persons the presiding judge of the superior court may call a grand jury either:
1. If, in the judge’s sole discretion, the judge determines the public interest requires a grand jury.
2. On petition of the county attorney.
A.R.S. 21-421. State grand juries; impaneling; term
A. Upon written application by the attorney general there shall be a state grand jury with jurisdiction extending throughout the state impaneled each year by any superior court judge designated from time to time as a state grand jury assignment judge by the chief justice of the Arizona supreme court. Such assignment judge shall serve at the pleasure of the chief justice. A state grand jury shall be impaneled within the county in which the assignment judge is serving.
B. Whenever the attorney general determines it to be in the best interest to convene additional state grand juries, he may apply in writing to the chief justice of the Arizona supreme court for the designation of an additional assignment judge and the chief justice shall designate an additional assignment judge in accordance with the provisions of this article. Such assignment judge shall serve at the pleasure of the chief justice. Such assignment judge may, for good cause shown, impanel an additional state grand jury in accordance with the application, in which event such state grand jury shall have statewide jurisdiction. In making his determination as to the need for impaneling an additional state grand jury, the assignment judge may require a showing that the matter cannot be effectively handled by a county grand jury or an existing state grand jury. At no one time shall more than three state grand juries be impaneled.
C. The regular term of the state grand jury shall be six months. The term may be shortened by the assignment judge at the request of the attorney general. The term may be extended by the assignment judge for a specified time period upon a verified, written petition by the attorney general stating that an extension is needed to conclude a grand jury inquiry begun prior to the expiration of its term.
GeorgeM, 7 months ago