More Tyranny From State Agencies to Protect Criminal Obama, WA threatens ballot challenger with sanctions
Posted by By Pamela Barnett at 8 September, at 18 : 17 PM Print
Tyrannical Deputy Solicitor General Even of Washington State threatens a state citizen with sanctions if she appeals the court decision that was based on faulty reasoning by the judge. This is an example of a growing list of tyrannical behavior by state agencies to protect criminal fraud aka Barack Hussein Obama.
The judge cherry picked faulty rulings to dismiss ballot challenger Linda Jordan’s complaint. Now the Washington State Attorney General’s office threatens her. I wonder if this is standard operating procedure when citizens sue the state or if Obama and the federal purse strings he controls are the reason.
Washington State Attorney General Threatens Obama Ballot Challenger
This is nothing more than the government trying to intimidate and prevent an individual due access and process of the law. What the AG leaves out is that the cases mentioned 2 are active on appeal and the 3rd one the judge and defendants abdicated their claims of a frivolous suit because the attorney demanded that he be able to subpoena the evidence the judge and defendants claim were frivolous. They dropped the frivolous charge like a hot potato because they would have to honor the subpoenas that would allow for the aattorney’s defense. In other words Obama’s attorneys had to provide Obama’s birth certificate and other documents or drop the charge in order to keep the documents hidden.
Jollyroger88805, 8 months ago
MS LINDA JORDAN—LINDA JORDAN HAS A STATEMENT FROM HOMELAND SEC E-VERIFY SYSTEM THAT SAYS OBama HAS NO LEGAL SOC SEC NUMBER.—THE WASH STATE OFFICIALS MUST BE CHARGED WITH TREASON WHEN OBAMA IS FOUND ILLEGAL ALIEN FORGER USURPER FOREIGNER.
ALEX, 8 months ago
Sounds like blackmail to me, but of course when lawyers do it, it is “legal”.
omad, 8 months ago
Don’t want to stir the pot, but why is it everytime this happens I can almost hear a SEIG HEIL from the Obots???
Bob Porrazzo, 8 months ago
[...] comes as Washington State officials give in to Obama regarding his records (why is it everytime this happens I can almost hear a SEIG HEIL?!) Share this:TwitterFacebookLike [...]
NO WONDER THE DNC DENIED ISRAEL’S CAPITOL AS JERUSALEM! « bobsbox, 8 months ago
Oh no! From the Yurtis v. Phipps decision cited by the AG:
“An individual does not have an absolute and unlimited constitutional right of access to the judicial system. Ms. Yurtis’s claims have been repeatedly rejected and found to be frivolous. We conclude that the trial court did not err by granting the motion to dismiss and motion for sanctions. We also award attorney fees and costs to Mr. Phipps, and order sanctions of $2,500 to be paid by Ms. Yurtis to Mr. Phipps.”
How will Linda Jordan respond?
Real Lawyer, 8 months ago
Linda Jordan is being illegally intimidated, something which Obots like you seem to be quite comfortable with. Everything she claims has been shown to be true. So, it’s hardly “frivolous.”
GeorgeM, 8 months ago
wow .. a real liaryer .. Is that a ‘personal opinion’ re Constitutional right to the Court? First you have WHAT qualifications in a Court?
Oh a license to practice ‘law!’ Bull shit .. that is a ‘frivolous claim’ counselor … a liaryer’s ‘lie’ .. perhaps a license for sex .. a license to drive .. but NEVER a ‘license’ to practice law .. ALSO no Constitution [State or federal] grants ‘rights’ idiot! .. Constitutions were initially formed to set up ‘government and act as a ‘restriction’ upon government today ITS ‘subject .. public ‘servants’
or in laymens terms ‘sub servants.’ Obviously [fortunately] you lack adequate intelligence/ethics to voice ‘judicial opinion’ .. much less ANY delegated ‘judicial authority’ … In the future get yourself familiar with all facits of law .. also the use of the U.S. mail using ‘threats’ therein .. ‘frivilous’ use of ones Christian names .. their family names .. and/or their respective Trust’s .. WHICH YOU ALL
USE REGULARLY to ‘launder money’ via the quasi Court SYSTEM
But I love you ALL just no respect for your quasi ‘profession’
‘laundering money’ .. acting in ‘collusion’ with other ‘court officers often against your client … allowed per your C.J.S. vol. 7
not to mention a slight element of FRAUD
Hope you can understand this man .. Yes??
just humble views here .. care to rebut
obviously under ‘penalties of perjury’
however absent ‘ethics’ .. swearing would be
inconsequential .. Yes?
AGAIN : a real lawyer .. WHAT A JOKE!!
Carl Gustalman, 8 months ago
ALL ‘law’ is ‘contract’ AND ALL ‘contract’ is ‘Law’
FACT
A ‘Public servants’ ‘Oath of Office’ is a ‘contract’
legally binding however the A.G. as well as the
administrator/clerk d.b.a. ‘Judge’ probably has NO
LAWFUL ‘Oath’ .. guessing here their ‘Oath’ is/
was taken in their respective ‘commercial capacities.
Imposing ‘sanctions’ from an ‘administrative’ is an
‘administrative act/action .. thus it constitutes only
the ‘personal opinion’ of the Court administrator
(e.g. Judge). All sanctions involving ‘debts’ must
possess ‘Verification of the debt’ .. sorry folks where
the ‘Hell’ did you folks hide IT? It is NOT here!
15 USC § 1692g – Validation of debts
You should also KNOW .. Superior Courts ARE NOT
‘County’ .. nor are they [Judicial] district courts.
Collusion is ‘conspiracy’ .. a ‘felony’ offense .. omission
to perform a public duty .. is a ‘misdemeanor’ .. perjury
of one quasi ‘Oath’ is a ‘felony’ .. use of the U.S. mail ..
using ‘threats’ is further a ‘felony’ offense .. check you
administrative damn laws ..NOT my opinion ..
Remember: Take an ‘oath’ under ‘penal tie of perjury’
expect to go to ‘penal house’ .. voluntarily .. Yes?
IF the AG remains ‘silent’ to allegations .. thus fact under
‘doctrine of aquiesense’ he/she/it remain in ‘dishonor
of the ‘Court’ .. ALSO Linda Jordan business with her
Superior Court .. n the A.G. both are ‘trading companies’
thus damn well better be listed as such on Dunn and
Bradstreet .. OBVIOUSLY both the Court ‘Administrator’
(e.g. Judge) and the A.G. has ALSO included this little fact
in their respective documentations .. sorry WHERE is this
slight ‘oversight’ .. humble views .. ANY rebuttal here??
Carl Gustalman, 8 months ago
re: ‘Frivolous AG letter date Sept. 6, 2012
‘impose sanctions’ .. hey! JEFFERY T. EVENS .. Is this just your
silly ‘personal opinion’?
‘RAP 18.9 .. ah .. dah! You omitted to provide the ‘regulation’
and/or the ‘enactment clause’ which makes this ‘mandatory’ ..
perhaps that is due to you deficiency as a liaryer ..
equally as a ‘sub (dah! 14th amendment) servant’ ( ‘public
servant’ .. ‘checks paid from tax payer $$’s .. REMEMBER?)
‘frivolous appeal’ .. hey dumb dumb .. read over YOUR quasi
‘Oath of Office’ ALL OF YOU LAME BRAINS .. ‘to defend
against foreign and domestic enemies’ ..
Question: British ‘Esquire’ EVEN .. Is this unsubstantiated claim
of ‘frivolous appeal’ meant to be a smoke screen for YOUR
ALL intentionally committing ACT OF TREASON against the
United States of America .. paramount its U.S. Constitution?
OR PERHAPS ..
Just a simple case of ‘perjury of your worthless ‘Oath’ ??
Which one idiot ‘Deputy Solicitor’ or perhaps tis BOTH ..
P.S. Is your bar number your ‘bond’ used when you
intentionally do not perform your duty(s)/violate your ‘Oath?’
This man noticed YOU Esquire EVEN signed your silly letter
in your ‘commercial’ capacity .. Yes? Do you possess the I.Q.
to comprehend this implication?? Have you in grade school
read RICO .. ever ??
You ARE NOT going to inform this man ALL of you take your
quasi ‘Oaths’ in your commercial capacities .. Are YOU??
AGAIN In re your ‘frivolous’ letter .. was this ‘sent’ via the
U.S. mail?? AND are you THAT ignorant of another federal
law as concerns ‘U.S. Mail Fraud’ .. read the damn thing
‘SERVANT’ .. and act your ‘part’ .. YOU ARE SUB SERVANT
entity period. YOU POSSESS NO JUDICIAL AUTHORITY!
No wonder you are unable to swear to the truthfulness of
your utter BULL SHIT. Only CLONES believe have merit!
Had that ‘CRAP’ been sent to this man .. you would have the
privilege of a ‘Subpoena’ to obtain YOUR British Archives
records for the prior (before 1964) British colony ‘Kenya’
as regards YOUR Barack Obama ‘Birth Certificate.’
ALSO you could provide a ‘copy of his Indonesian passport
.. or perhaps you do not where either of these countries are
located .. Perhaps their geographical location is ‘frivolous’
since you may be ignorant of their location(s). Yes?
Oh! .. Where is the ‘Verification of Debt’ as concerns your silly
sanctions .. are you IGNORANT OF THAT AS WELL?
No wonder you never sign anything under ‘Oath’ .. your ‘word’
has ABSOLUTELY no legal merit .. just like your quasi letter.
Please ANY real liaryer out there/here want to ‘rebut!’ ..
ah! .. Let me guess my frivolous claims here .. yes?
My my mal feasance .. mis feasance .. non feasance ..
Paramount the term is ‘collusion’ .. and ‘TREASON’
LOOK THE ‘TERM(s)’ UP!
Carl Gustalman, 8 months ago