New Arizona Obama Ballot Challenge Filed Today
Posted by By Pamela Barnett at 17 February, at 21 : 00 PM Print
New Obama ballot challenge filed today in Arizona. This is the second lawsuit to be filed there. The first was by Van Irion of the Liberty Legal Foundation in federal court. This new challenge is in state court.
Well done, Mr. Allen. The pressure needs to be kept on in this matter, wherever and however.
Indeed, your rights as a Citizen have been violated. You have a right to have a legal candidate running for and sitting in the office of the presidency of the country.
He should not be referred to as the president of the United States. He should be referred to as the putative president, or the illegal president, or the Usurper-in-chief.
This matter needs to command all the attention it can get, from a citizenry unfortunately having largely been duped, and kept in ignorance and/or distracted with fun and games on the telly. The crime reeks, and the stench of it must pervade the culture, until The People are forced to respond. Not allowed to avoid it, any longer.
This is the rule of law in the country were talking about. Not some minor, obscure bit of judicial floss. It goes to the very heart of the constitutional compact. Its flaunting must not be allowed to stand.
Stan, 1 year ago
WE CAN’T GIVE UP….NEED TO KEEP GOING LIKE ORLY, SHE’S ONE TOUGH WOMAN……
Barbie, 1 year ago
Obama Sr was never domiciled in the USA.
He was always domiciled in Kenya.
borderraven, 1 year ago
Re: Q: Is it possible that Obama trvaleed with a U.S. Passport in 1981?A: No. It is not possible.Pakistan was on the U.S. State Department’s “no travel” list in 1981. This is the kind of posting that gives birthers a bad name. It is not true that Pakistan was on a no-travel list in 1981. And Pakistan did not keep US citizens from visiting. It was eager to have tourists visit. So any US citizen could visit using a US passport, and Obama was one of them. He never had either a British passport or an Indonesian passport. He was never an Indonesian citizen, as both the US State Department and Indonesia have said.He did, however, have a US passport, which he used to travel from the USA to Indonesia when his mother moved there, and then to return from Indonesia to Hawaii to attend school. If he had not used a US passport on these trips, he would have required a US visa on a foreign passport, and there would be a record of the application for that visa, which would have been found by now.So, it is NOT true that Pakistan was on a no-travel list. It is not true that US citizens could not travel to Pakistan using US passports. And, Obama had a US passport. This answers the question based on the false claim that Pakistan was on a no-travel list.
Steph, 7 months ago
What evidence do you have that “obama”/Soetoro had a US passport and that he travelled to Pakistan on it in 1981.
Don’t you think it would be good if those records were released to clear his name?
GeorgeM, 7 months ago
We need Court Challenges in every state even the extra 7 that Obama Claims we have.
Bruce Olsen, 1 year ago
[...] http://obamaballotchallenge.com/new-arizona-obama-ballot-challenge-filed-today Share this:ShareTwitterStumbleUponFacebookRedditLinkedInDiggEmailLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. Leave a Comment [...]
Obama Headed for Court in Arizona, Meet him at the Airport Joe! « The Arizona Sentinel, 1 year ago
Emeritus,That is because of anhtoer Atty, who posts on her website and who uses her minions like the post and email to call for the assassination of Obama and those who voted for him, who call for armed revolt, dangerous things. A lot of people voted for Obama that did not know about the citizenship issues. I know people who voted for Obama, they regret it, but they had not heard anything about the citizenship issues we are fighting.It was sent over the internet today about a march in D.C. and in essence it was calling for harm for Obama and anyone who voted for him. This has NOTHING to do with our birth certificate march on Washington, D.C. These types of behaviors give the public the WRONG idea and only hurt our questions into the constitutional eligibility of Soetoro/Obama.Legal questions are one thing, which we whole heartedly support; however, violence is anhtoer and we will not support or tolerate such acts or the call for such acts.
Marvin, 7 months ago
Americans Are Waking Up To Obama And The NWO
Virginia House Passes NDAA Nullification 96-4
http://www.infowars.com/virginia-house-passes-ndaa-nullification-96-4/
Bloodless Coup, 1 year ago
[...] ballot access challenges were filed in Arizona and Pennsylvania this week by two well-known patriots. Please be sure to support these efforts at [...]
Looking for Balls « drkatesview, 1 year ago
Re: see no logical or paaitccrl difference between a child of a diplomat, or a child of tourists or others who were here on visitors’ visas who happens to born while the parents were visiting the U.S., or most importantly a child of an illegal alien.Under the rules of Strict Construction interpretation, which Conservatives favor, you are not allowed to read something into a term. If the term was used to mean born in the country, that is what it meant. You cannot say but surely they would have worried about Dual Nationality if there is nothing in the words that indicated that they worried to the extent of writing the words into the Constitution.The Wong Kim Ark case said very clearly that even the children of visitors were covered.It said: By the common law of England, every person born within the dominions of the Crown, no matter whether of English or of foreign parents, and, in the latter case, whether the parents were settled or merely temporarily sojourning, in the country, was an English subject, save only the children of foreign ambassadors (who were excepted because their fathers carried their own nationality with them), or a child born to a foreigner during the hostile occupation of any part of the territories of England. No effect appears to have been given to descent as a source of nationality. EVEN TEMPORARILY SOJOURNING. And it said: therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign State or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.III. The same rule was in force in all the English Colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution as originally established. So EVERY child was Natural Born.And that is why Yale Law review wrote: It is well settled that “native-born” citizens, those born in the United States, qualify as natural born. And why such prominent conservative Senators who are also lawyers as Orren Hatch and Lindsay Graham say that a Natural Born Citizen is simply one who was born in the USA:Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said:“Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.” (December 11, 2008 letter to constituent)Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT), said:“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)
Auth, 7 months ago
I’ll take what’s in here: http://art2superpac.com/issues.html over Lindsey Graham any day.
GeorgeM, 7 months ago
This has been a long road for everyone 3years ago I filed my first suit in federal court against Obama for documents under the FOIA and received to date more than 400 pages of mostly junk. As American we know how to fight when were pushed and as a veteran I took an oath that I intend on keeping. Americans when pushed into a corner will fight that much harder.
Kenneth Allen, 1 year ago
for all those of you like the Arizona sentinel, and others who blog, everyone in every county of Arizona and the other 49 states should file a challenge in their counties, it won’t cost like it did me mine was 236.00 only because I added a complaint, any elector can file a challenge. If anyone here knows of an attorney here in Arizona with any kind of courage let him know that the article II legal defense fund is raising money to help with legal expenses. If one attorney could come forward we would have a hundred or so plaintiff and could start a class action state suit. I think our constitution is worth fighting for don’t you. Doesn’t everyone know we are close to losing our country and if Obama gets in he will finish what he started and the republicans we have in office now won’t stop him because they are just as much the problem.
Think about it!!!
Kenneth Allen, 1 year ago
Emeritus,Diplomatic status is not rviroacttee. What is relevant is that Barack Obama Sr. was not a diplomat when Barack Obama Jr. was born (even if he was, I believe that Barack Jr. would have (natural born) citizen status transmitted via his mother). Natural born status derives from birth one cannot become’ a natural born citizen if they were not born one and one cannot lose natural born citizen status (except by renouncing their citizenship) that one has from birth. The only things that the long form’ birth certificate would reveal are mundane details that you wouldn’t accept anyway. So feel free to keep banging your head against the wall I’ll rest easy knowing that you and everyone like you are wrong on the facts, wrong on the law, and wrong on the Constitution. The only thing that you have to look forward to is the supreme court taking judicial notice of President Obama’s birth in Hawaii and verifying the common law definition of natural born’ if someone actually manages to find a plaintiff with standing.
Ronny, 7 months ago
Even if father wasn’t diplomat (he wasn’t when Obama was supposedly born, anyway), “Obama” ain’t natural born:
14th amendment and Wong Kim Ark have ZERO to do with natural born citizenship. Hassan v FEC should drive that home.
Minor v Happereset, Venus and other cases are the controlling precedents- never overturned, continuously upheld by SCOTUS.
In any case, Obama can’t even prove he was born here- He hasn’t a shred of valid, legal proof that he is eligible, or even born here: forged birth certificate, forged draft registration, stolen Social Security numbers, failed EVerify check, evidence of Kenyan birth.
Read about natural born citizenship: art2supepac.com/issues.html.
GeorgeM, 7 months ago
[...] candidacy have been filed in Missouri, New Hampshire, Illinois, California, New Mexico, New York, Arizona and [...]
Democrat Presidential Candidate Will Proceed with Eligibility Challenge Against Obama| The Post & Email, 1 year ago