Note of Issue/Certificate of Readiness for Strunk/Obama NY Trial

5 Comments

1. 
   Tried to donate, site will not open. Please advise an alternate method.

   John B, 5 months ago Reply

   • 
     I forwarded your request to Chris Strunk.

     GeorgeM, 5 months ago Reply
2. 
   The New York electors voted on December 17, 2012 and have until 12-30-12 to challenge the Note of Issue entered by the Clerk of the State Court on 12-10-12.

   On Thursday 12-27-12, I am filing an original proceeding in DC Circuit challenging the New York vote in Congress after 01-03-13.

   12- PENDING -OP
   ________________________________________________

   UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
   ____________________________________________________________________
   In re Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse a private U.S. Citizen beneficiary

   PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS
   ____________________________________________________________________
   Christopher-Earl: Strunk© in esse private U.S. Citizen secured beneficiary with injury in re the criminal usurpation of the office of POTUS by Barack Obama’s ineligibility under U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 and related law in Petitioner’s Original Proceeding for writ of mandamus FRAP Rule 21 for an Order of:

   A. Congress to show cause why it should not hold the $43 Trillion Dollar theft by Barack Obama et al. since 2003 null and void under the 14th Amendment Section 4.
   B. Congress to show cause why under the 12th, 20th, 25th amendments and U.S. Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 (A2S1C5) Barack Hussein Obama II should be eligible to take the oath of office of POTUS January 20, 2013;
   C. The Clerk and Speaker of the U.S. House with Majority / Minority Leaders and President of the U.S. Senate as to the incompatibility of any Person serving as an electoral college member while holding an office of trust or profit under the 14th Amendment United States and Constitution Article 2 Section 1 Clause 2 (A2S1C2);
   D. New York State Justices in the matter of their denial of Petitioner due process and equal treatment due under the 14th Amt. of the U.S. Constitution and NYS Constitution and related law as to denial of trial of the facts as compelling public interest as to forgery crime aided and abetted by Electors- a Quo Warranto matter;
   E. The Governor of New York for a NEW U.S. Senate Election in New York to comply with the 17th Amendment of the US Constitution
   F. Congress barring the New York Electoral College vote for Barack Obama.
   G. And for such other and different relief until this matter is resolved herein.
   ____________________________________________________________________
   593 Vanderbilt Avenue #281
   Brooklyn, New York 11238
   Cell-845-901-6767; chris@strunk.ws
   Christopher-Earl: Strunk © in esse

   chris strunk, 5 months ago Reply
3. 
   The Respondents had 20 days from 12/10/12 to respond to the Note of Issue; as of 12-21-12 the NYS Attorney General filed a motion to dismiss with a return date of January 22, 2013. The rope draws tighter.

   Note that the Court on its own initiative changed the caption from “Strunk v Jeffries et al.” to Strunk v Board of Elections” – The BOE was never named!

   Best regards

   Chris Strunk

   — On Fri, 12/21/12, Bill Van Allen wrote:

   From: Bill Van Allen
   Subject: Court: Kings Civil Supreme Index Number: 021948/2012 Case Name: STRUNK, CHRISTOPHER-EARL vs. BOARD OF ELECTIONS
   To: “Christopher Strunk”
   Cc: “ORLY” , pamelabarnett@hushmail.com, microcapmaven@aol.com, “Mario Apuzzo Esq.” , richardwinger@yahoo.com
   Date: Friday, December 21, 2012, 10:23 PM

   Court:

   Kings Civil Supreme

   Index Number:

   021948/2012

   Case Name:

   STRUNK, CHRISTOPHER-EARL vs. BOARD OF ELECTIONS

   Case Type:

   Special Proceedings

   Track:

   Standard

   RJI Filed:

   11/16/2012

   Date NOI Due:

   NOI Filed:

   Disposition Date:

   Calendar Number:

   Jury Status:

   Justice Name:

   DAVID SCHMIDT (PT. 47)

   Attorney/Firm For Plaintiff:

   CHRISTOPER-EARL STRUNK – Prose

   Attorney Type: Pro se

   Atty. Status: Active

   Attorney/Firm For Defendant:

   HAKEEM JEFFRIES – Prose

   Attorney Type: Pro se

   Atty. Status: Active

   WebCivil Supreme – Appearance Detail

   Court:

   Kings Civil Supreme

   Index Number:

   021948/2012

   Case Name:

   STRUNK, CHRISTOPHER-EARL vs. BOARD OF ELECTIONS

   Case Type:

   Special Proceedings

   Track:

   Standard

   Appearance Information:

   Appearance
   Date

   Time

   On For

   Appearance
   Outcome

   Justice /
   Part

   Comments

   Motion
   Seq

   01/22/2013

   Motion

   DAVID SCHMIDT (PT. 47)
   SUBSEQUENT MOTION PART

   002

   11/19/2012

   Motion

   Motion Decided-Open Appearance

   DAVID SCHMIDT (PT. 47)
   ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE PART

   PT. 47 JUDGE
   DECLINED TO SIGN OSC

   001

   WebCivil Supreme – Motion Detail

   Court:

   Kings Civil Supreme

   Index Number:

   021948/2012

   Case Name:

   STRUNK, CHRISTOPHER-EARL vs. BOARD OF ELECTIONS

   Case Type:

   Special Proceedings

   Track:

   Standard

   Motion Information:

   Motion
   Number

   Date
   Filed

   Filed
   By

   Relief Sought

   Submit
   Date

   Answer
   Demanded

   Status

   Decision

   Order
   Signed Date

   002

   12/21/2012

   DEF

   Dismissal

   No

   Open:

   Before Justice: SCHMIDT

   001

   11/19/2012

   PLAINT

   Misc. Special Proceedings

   No

   Decided: 19-NOV-12
   DECLINED TO SIGN APPLICATION
   Before Justice: SCHMIDT

   Short Form Order

   11/19/2012

   chris strunk, 5 months ago Reply
4. 
   From Plaintiff Chris Strunk!

   http://www.scribd.com/doc/117739292/ROUGH-DRAFT-DC-Circuit-Petition-for-Writ-of-Mandamus-for-Relief-12-Xxxx-OP

   chris strunk, 5 months ago Reply

Post Your Comment