Obama Attempts to Intimidate Opposition Attorney in RICO Case to Be Heard Friday in MS
Posted by By Pamela Barnett at 15 November, at 01 : 21 AM Print
Barack Obama’s attorneys attempted to intimidate an attorney in a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) case regarding Obama’s forged Hawaii birth certificate and forged Selective Service Registration (Draft Card), and Obama’s use of a social security number never assigned to him according to federal database (E-Verify). See here and here. The next hearing on this case is Friday, Nov. 16, 1 p.m., at the federal court house at 245 W. Capitol St. in Jackson, MS, and is open to the public.
Scott Tepper, Esq, attorney for Obama, sent an email threat to sanction Orly Taitz, Esq., plaintiff representing herself in the federal RICO case, because she filed an affidavit that shows that the “Obama birth certificate” that Tepper filed with the court was further altered from the original forgery at whitehouse.gov. This case was filed in the Southern District of Mississippi the Honorable Henry Wingate, a Ronald Regean appointee, now presiding.
From pleading filed by Taitz -
Tepper e-mailed Taitz and other plaintiffs a proposed settlement offer, where he wanted Taitz not to make any “defamatory remarks” about defendants and their attorneys and pay $25,000 attorneys’ fees to Attorney Begley or otherwise defendants will go after Plaintiffs seeking a much higher amount. Considering the fact that neither Taitz nor any of the Plaintiffs have stated anything defamatory, that all of their statements were true statements based on sworn affidavits and neither have done anything frivolous to warrant any award of fees, Taitz believes that this “offer” was a form of intimidation, particularly an intimidation of coplaintiffs and desire to silence Taitz and co-plaintiff’s regarding modifications in the image of the alleged birth certificate, which was sent by Tepper to the director of Health Loretta Fuddy. Further Tepper and Begley engaged in a campaign of harassment and intimidation, appeared on the radio, specifically RCR blogtalk radio, where they threatened that they will be going after the house of Taitz. This was done with a clear desire to intimidate and harass not only Taitz, but her whole family, her husband and her 3 children.
In light of all of the tyrannical vote fraud nationwide in this recent past presidential and other federal elections, this could be one of the last opportunities to bring Obama’s fraud crimes to justice. This could be the last line in the sand against complete tyranny in the federal government and elections systems. Showing up will let the judge know that there is great importance and public interest in this case, that the American people will not let this denial or rights regarding the usurper President Barack Obama stand.
Orly’s panties are twisted because she received a demand letter? Bitch doesn’t understand legal procedure. She is being set up. Such a demand is required before the motion for sanctions.
Jennifer, 6 months ago
I think she realizes that, Dear.
GeorgeM, 6 months ago
Based on the tenor of this article, I think she doesn’t. Darling.
Jennifer, 6 months ago
Regardless of what you think about the tenor of Capt. Barnett’s article, which sounds kinda soprano to me, it is a blatant attempt at intimidation, sweetie. By the way, if you did your homework, you would know that the whitehouse.gov phony “birth certificate” image HAS been altered multiple times, so Tepper is not necessarily guilty of doing that, nor was he accused of doing so.
GeorgeM, 6 months ago
By the way, if you would read the submission, you would know that what was verified was not the copy of the BC but the DATA on file in the Hawaii DOH. Significant legal distinction, but, Sugar Pie, one I doubt you are capable of recognizing.
Jennifer, 6 months ago
Exactly my point, Dearest. They “verified” only part of it and would NOT confirm that the fraudulent digital WH image was valid, because it ISN’T. Even with their clever dissembling, they are already up to their necks in fraud. By the way, their own laws permit release of the B/C, if it exists, because it is in the public interest, which they are refusing to invoke.
GeorgeM, 6 months ago
They “could” ADD extra to confirm that his intent is that of a corrupt man and does everything in very “premeditated” and criminal acts.
Throw in F&F and the disaster of Libya…running guns, selling guns to those who murdered innocent people as well as American Citizens representing the USA in Libya.
The pattern of behavior would add weight to the case as” his normal” modus operandi.
Elaine, 6 months ago
I phrased that poorly, but I think you understand what I was working towards.
Elaine, 6 months ago
1) Tepper filed with the court an “Obama birth certificate” that was further altered from the original forgery at whitehouse.gov
2) Obama attorney Tepper sent to HI director of Health Loretta Fuddy a modified image of the alleged birth certificate
Tepper modified the whitehouse.gov image? I’d like to know more about this.
John, 6 months ago
The Defense did no such thing. In Orly’s First Amended Complaint in MS (FAC), Orly attached a photocopy of the LFBC but not the COLB even though she references the COLB repeatedly in her FAC. The photocopy of the LFBC that she did submit as evidence was barely readable because Orly keeps photocopying from photocopies of photocopies. The lawyers explain this in footnote 10 on page 16:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/92443331/2012-05-04-MDEC-Memo-in-Support-of-Motion-for-JOP-with-Exhibits
” See FAC at page 12 ¶ 1 and page 36 ¶ b. Although Plaintiffs do attach a couple copies of the LFBC to their FAC, it
– like many of Plaintiffs exhibits is barely legible. While Plaintiffs reference the COLB in their Complaint (at page 36 ¶ b), the MDEC was unable to find a copy of that document contained in Plaintiffs voluminous and disorganized exhibits. Therefore,the MDEC has attached to its Motion a legible a copy of the LFBC (Motion Exhibit 1) and COLB (Motion Exhibit 2).”
As you can see in at the link below, the COLB was not included with the FEC. Orly did attach a copy of the LFBC, but it is barely readable. See page 118.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/92041727/2012-04-19-Taitz-First-Amended-Complaint-Petition-With-Exhibits
This is the motion in which the Defense submitted the COLB and LFBC; see pages 9 and 10:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/92436040/2012-05-04-MDEC-Motion-for-JOP-with-Exhibits
For some bizarre reason, Orly believes that she can submit photocopies and/or printouts if the COLB and LFBC, but the Defense cannot. Interestingly, the copies from the Defense and from Orly … and WH.com, ALL contain the exact same information.
funnyhaha71, 6 months ago