Obama Eligibility Case Requested To Move To Oral Arguments At US Supreme Court
Posted by By GeorgeM at 16 February, at 19 : 10 PM Print
Above: Ed Noonan, winner of the 2012 California Presidential Primary for the American Independent Party (AIP) and one of the original plaintiffs of the “California 7″ case.
We have no word on the outcome of Friday’s Supreme Court Conference on whether to hear the Noonan v Bowen California case appeal. We hear that a decision should be made by Tuesday. We’re just putting this article up to help keep it in the consciousness of at least some of the public. MSM has ignored it and will likely issue a short mocking of it if the decision is no, as have been all cases on this topic, to date, if not simply ignored or “lost.”
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court was asked to move from conference to oral hearing concerning the Obama eligibility case. Dr. Orly Taitz’s application, to be heard on behalf of Edward Noonan, was denied by Justice Kennedy on December 13, 2012. However, the application was refiled and resubmitted to the Chief Justice on December 26, 2012 and listed as “Distributed for Conference of Februrary 15, 2013, according to the SCOTUS website.
According to Suzanne Eovaldi, “February 15, 2013, Attorney Orly Taitz brings her request to move the Obama eligibility challenge from conference to the oral hearing stage at the US Supreme Court. She is moving forward in spite of the fact that four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who denied her petition originally. ‘But I resubmitted to Justice Roberts, and he sent it to the conference,’ Taitz said.”
“The California attorney is asking ‘…how do we know that he (Kennedy) ever saw the brief?’ Eovaldi writes. “In no uncertain terms, clerk James Baldin told her that ‘I (Taitz) [was] not allowed to see the signature.’ This denial of her right to see Kennedy’s signature ‘does not make any sense.’”
“Attorney Taitz is presenting evidence that 1 1/2 million invalid voter registrations were filed in the state of California!” Eovaldi concluded. “She is asking US citizens to ‘please, write and fax SCOTUS and demand to see the order by Justice Anthony Kennedy, who allegedly originally denied my case Noonan v Bowen before it was sent by Justice Roberts to the conference.’ Is not this the very least we can do to attempt to clear up this matter?”
Not only is the claim that the birth certificate posted online at the White House website alleged to be a forgery and with good reason to suspect so, but also Obama’s passport records have never been released nor has his college transcripts.
Obama’s Connecticut Social Security Number Flagged By E-Verify[/caption]Additionally there is the issue of his Social Security number allegedly being from Connecticut. Marv Dumon writes,”The SSN apparently fails the government’s own E-Verify system and generates the name ‘Harrison J. Bounel’. Bounel appears to be a relative of Michelle Robinson Obama. The incidence was first reported in the mid-2000s when a background check was conducted on Barack Obama when he was in the process of purchasing a home in Chicago. The purchase became a public scandal when it was discovered that Obama had received a favorable price (worth hundreds of thousands of dollars) on his mansion from a convicted felon and lobbyist.”
Obama’s Connecticut Social Security Number Flagged By E-Verify
Concerned citizen and “employer” of Barack Obama, Linda Jordan, even went so far as to write Obama to have him verify his information, after his Social Security number failed the government’s E-Verification.
‘
Read previous reports on our California and Washington DC news pages.
I think it would be important for someone to request to see a denied order from Justice Kennedy for a different case….
jd, 3 months ago
In view of Atty. Taitz’s reports on her being denied the opportunity to verify that Justice Kennedy ever did in fact sign her previously denied paperwork, I think you should have written “…was…” purportedly “…denied by Justice Kennedy on…”
I’m not trying to be picky here, it’s just that Atty. Taitz has expressed serious suspicions that the clerks of the court may have intentionally side-tracked her filings with the court, perhaps even diverting them from the Justice who it is maintained the documents were submitted, which, in itself would be an egregious crime against the Constitution. You feel me?
chris farrell, 3 months ago
Well, in the past, clerks have “lost” at least one case which we know was ON THE DOCKET.
GeorgeM, 3 months ago
Whoa:
“…four African-American Supreme Court clerks refused to allow Taitz to see the signature of Justice Anthony Kennedy, who denied her petition originally.”
These are the same SC clerks who give recommendations to the SCOTUS regarding the cases up for consideration at the Conference???
Something very fishy here. Orly is right to question this procedure.
Stan, 3 months ago
If Supreme Court turns this over to Congress I’m afraid we are doomed. To many of the R’s would go to jail if they rule against Obozo, theyed rather watch us suffer than go to jail themselves. How did we end up with lawmakers like this? cry cry cry I’m sure when God makes the finale judgement on them they won’t enjoy the outcome.
AnthonyJ, 3 months ago
We can pray for sanity, but if money talks the first time, then we all know how this goes, and we all know the next step. We are only patiently waiting for the next necessary shoe to drop.
Ratchell, 3 months ago