Obama May Have Supplied Arms Used in Benghazi Attack

One Comment

1. 
   From: Nancy Battle
   Date: Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 12:08 PM
   Subject: Fwd: WILL YOU REPRESENT TRUE AMERICANS AGAINST BARACK OBAMA, ET AL? – Complaints against Obama
   To:

   Anyone seen this? What do you think about this? Maybe COP could be part of this? Perhaps a large class? Feed back please! B.

   Sent from my iPhone

   Begin forwarded message:

   From: “Tony Caputo”
   Date: December 5, 2012 3:14:33 AM EST
   To: ” Rush Limbaugh Show**” , “Sean Hannity @ Fox News” , “Tucker Carlson**” , “Western Journalism” , “Michael Berry Radio**”
   Cc: “Democrats Crooks & Liars” , “Democrats Stole this Election*”
   Subject: WILL YOU REPRESENT TRUE AMERICANS AGAINST BARACK OBAMA, ET AL? – Complaints against Obama

   DEAR PATRIOTS OF AMERICA:

   PLEASE HELP SPREAD THE WORD ON THE BELOW ACTION AGAINST OBAMA AND THE COMMIE DEMOCRATS!

   To: Chris Hedges, Esquire

   U. S. Justice Foundation; UnSeal Obama Records; Vets for Justice; Voter Fraud A Felony; Voter Fraud All Over; Washington Times

   Subject: WILL YOU REPRESENT TRUE AMERICANS AGAINST BARACK OBAMA, ET AL? – Complaints against Obama

   DEAR CHRIS HEDGES:

   WILL YOU REPRESENT REAL AMERICANS AGAINST BARACK OBAMA, ERIC HOLDER, HARRY REID, NANCY PELOSI, HILLARY CLINTON AND MOST OF THE DEMOCRTIC PARTY FOR TREASON, PERJURY AND BREKING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS DESCRIBED BELOW?

   AS ANYONE WANTS TO SCROLL DOWN, THEY WILL SEE THAT YOU ARE SUING OBAMA IN OTHER CASES. THANK YOU,

   KINDLY ADVISE, THE PATRIOT FROM FLORIDA…..DECEMBER 5, 2012.

   From: Lee Gliddon [mailto:runlv2@yahoo.com]
   Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 9:38 PM
   To: undisclosed recipients:
   Subject: Complaints against Obama

   I am providing a document, Complaint, that enumerates many of the wrongdoings that have been committed by Obama during his first term in our White House.

   Use this if you choose and know that this Complaint is to be mailed, CERTIFIED, to The Foreman of the Sitting Grand Jury at the U.S. District Court in your area. For best results you may mail a copy to your members of Congress and to Robert Mueller, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigations.

   ‘Why’, you may ask.

   There are marching groups of protesters going to air their griefs during the Presidential Inauguration, but a Complaint is ONGOING and MUST BE RESPONDED TO!

   Additionally, many, like me, cannot get away to march in protest and are frustrated in watching this nation being torn apart by an Administration such as sitting in our White House this very day.

   So, if you are tired of watching TV, rteading the newspaper and just talking about our woes, here is a chance to get active and change the course of destruction of America as is being performed this very day.

   All you must do is ‘CUT AND PASTE’ (PAINT, press CNTRL C) this Complaint, ‘PASTE’ (CNTRL V) to a blank Word Document, and fill in the blanks.

   Signing before a Notary Public makes ths a Formal Complaint.

   If assistance is required, simply comment your question, and I will respond ASAP!

   Date ______________________

   To: U.S. District Court, (Venue)
   Attention: Foreman of sitting Federal Grand Jury
   _____________________________________(Street address)
   _________________________________ (City, State, ZIP)

   I __________________________(name ) as a citizen of the United States of America, having been born in ___________________ on __________(date of birth), and as a resident of _______________________________(city, County, State), I claim the Right to bring a Complaint against Barrack Hussein Obama as a person wrongfully named as eligible to hold the office of the President of the United States of America.

   SUBJECT: Formal Criminal Complaint naming Barrack Hussein Obama as a person in COMMISSION OF TREASON AND CRIMINAL ACTIVITES

   1. Barrack Hussein Obama, hereinafter Obama, represents a clear and present danger to the United States of America, the U.S. Constitution, and the Republic Government in his activities. Obama has not provided any documentation proving he is not foreign born. Documents provided by Obama pertaining to his birth as having taken place in Hawaii have been proven as forgeries. (Article II, Section1)

   2. Obama has steadfastly secreted the true facts of the 09/11/2012 attack on the U.S. Consulate located in Benghazi, Libya, while directed his subordinates to relate falsehoods as to the truth of such attack.

   3. During the attack of 09/11/2012 Obama ignored the requests for assistance made by Ambassador Stevens as well as by other U.S. Citizens. Such ignoring of assistance as was requested resulted in the deaths of four (4) U.S. Citizens.

   4. Prior to 09/11/2012 Obama was made aware of requests for additional security for the U.S. Consulate located at at Benghazi, Libya. With total disdain for the protection of lives of U.S. Citizens located at the U.S. Consulate at Benghazi, Libya, Obama denied such requests while causing the hiring of Libyan Security Personnel who abandoned their jobs when attacked by Al Qaeda members.

   5. Obama has caused the hiring of persons representing interests contrary to those of the National Security of the United States of America citizenry abroad.

   6. Obama has failed to protect the United States of America from invasion of its borders. He has violated his Oath of Office, Article IV, Section 4.

   7. Obama has violated Article IV, Section 4, in operating, Operation Fast and Furious, with the result of death to a U.S. Citizen.

   8. Obama has violated Article II, Section 3, in steadfastly refusing to, “faithfully,” execute Laws enacted by the United States Government.

   9. Obama has willfully violated Article iii, Section 3, in his overseeing the provision of weaponry to terrorist organizations such as HAMAS, Al Qaeda, and Hezbollah, thereby giving , “Aid and Comfort,” to enemies of the United States of America.

   10. Obama has violated Article VI in that he has appointed persons to Judicial positions who have failed to hold the United States of America’s Constitution as, “the Supreme Law of the land.”

   11. In addition to the foregoing violations, Obama has violated the Orders set forth by the Supreme Court as relate to Executive Privilege in that such has been claimed before a Congressional Committee rightfully pursuing the truth behind matters pertaining the investigation of Operation Fast and Furious. Both Obama as well as his appointed Attorney General, Eric Holder, publicly disavowed knowledge of such Operation, generated a letter asserting false wordings and later are seeking to ‘hide behind’ an assertion of Executive Privilege to escape responsibility for his, as well as Attorney General Eric Holder’s falsehoods.

   It is hereby alleged that these violations have taken place since January, 20, 2009 and continue to exist to the current date.

   Complainant : _____________________________________________
   Date: ____________________________________

   Sworn and signature before me (date) ____________________________

   Notary Public _____________________________________________

   Conservative Patriot
   http://conpats.blogspot.com/

   http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/why_im_suing_barack_obama_20120116/

   Why I’m Suing Barack Obama

   Email

   Print

   Share

   Posted on Jan 16, 2012

   AP / Dusan Vranic
   Detainees pray at the U.S. military detention facility known as Camp Bucca in Iraq in this 2009 photo.
   By Chris Hedges
   Attorneys Carl J. Mayer and Bruce I. Afran filed a complaint Friday in the Southern U.S. District Court in New York City on my behalf as a plaintiff against Barack Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta to challenge the legality of the Authorization for Use of Military Force as embedded in the latest version of the National Defense Authorization Act, signed by the president Dec. 31.
   The act authorizes the military in Title X, Subtitle D, entitled “Counter-Terrorism,” for the first time in more than 200 years, to carry out domestic policing. With this bill, which will take effect March 3, the military can indefinitely detain without trial any U.S. citizen deemed to be a terrorist or an accessory to terrorism. And suspects can be shipped by the military to our offshore penal colony in Guantanamo Bay and kept there until “the end of hostilities.” It is a catastrophic blow to civil liberties.
   To read Chris Hedges’ legal filing aimed at overturning a new law that would allow the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens deemed terrorism suspects, click here. To read the law itself, click here.
   I spent many years in countries where the military had the power to arrest and detain citizens without charge. I have been in some of these jails. I have friends and colleagues who have “disappeared” into military gulags. I know the consequences of granting sweeping and unrestricted policing power to the armed forces of any nation. And while my battle may be quixotic, it is one that has to be fought if we are to have any hope of pulling this country back from corporate fascism.
   Section 1031 of the bill defines a “covered person”—one subject to detention—as “a person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.”
   The bill, however, does not define the terms “substantially supported,” “directly supported” or “associated forces.”
   I met regularly with leaders of Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza. I used to visit Palestine Liberation Organization leaders, including Yasser Arafat and Abu Jihad, in Tunis when they were branded international terrorists. I have spent time with the Revolutionary Guard in Iran and was in northern Iraq and southeastern Turkey with fighters from the Kurdistan Workers’ Party. All these entities were or are labeled as terrorist organizations by the U.S. government. What would this bill have meant if it had been in place when I and other Americans traveled in the 1980s with armed units of the Sandinistas in Nicaragua or the Farabundo Marti National Liberation Front guerrillas in El Salvador? What would it have meant for those of us who were with the southern insurgents during the civil war in Yemen or the rebels in the southern Sudan? I have had dinner more times than I can count with people whom this country brands as terrorists. But that does not make me one.
   Once a group is deemed to be a terrorist organization, whether it is a Palestinian charity or an element of the Uighur independence movement, the military can under this bill pick up a U.S. citizen who supported charities associated with the group or unwittingly sent money or medical supplies to front groups. We have already seen the persecution and closure of Islamic charity organizations in the United States that supported the Palestinians. Now the members of these organizations can be treated like card-carrying “terrorists” and sent to Guantanamo.
   But I suspect the real purpose of this bill is to thwart internal, domestic movements that threaten the corporate state. The definition of a terrorist is already so amorphous under the Patriot Act that there are probably a few million Americans who qualify to be investigated if not locked up. Consider the arcane criteria that can make you a suspect in our new military-corporate state. The Department of Justice considers you worth investigating if you are missing a few fingers, if you have weatherproof ammunition, if you own guns or if you have hoarded more than seven days of food in your house. Adding a few of the obstructionist tactics of the Occupy movement to this list would be a seamless process. On the whim of the military, a suspected “terrorist” who also happens to be a U.S. citizen can suffer extraordinary rendition—being kidnapped and then left to rot in one of our black sites “until the end of hostilities.” Since this is an endless war that will be a very long stay.
   This demented “war on terror” is as undefined and vague as such a conflict is in any totalitarian state. Dissent is increasingly equated in this country with treason. Enemies supposedly lurk in every organization that does not chant the patriotic mantras provided to it by the state. And this bill feeds a mounting state paranoia. It expands our permanent war to every spot on the globe. It erases fundamental constitutional liberties. It means we can no longer use the word “democracy” to describe our political system.
   The supine and gutless Democratic Party, which would have feigned outrage if George W. Bush had put this into law, appears willing, once again, to grant Obama a pass. But I won’t. What he has done is unforgivable, unconstitutional and exceedingly dangerous. The threat and reach of al-Qaida—which I spent a year covering for The New York Times in Europe and the Middle East—are marginal, despite the attacks of 9/11. The terrorist group poses no existential threat to the nation. It has been so disrupted and broken that it can barely function. Osama bin Laden was gunned down by commandos and his body dumped into the sea. Even the Pentagon says the organization is crippled. So why, a decade after the start of the so-called war on terror, do these draconian measures need to be implemented? Why do U.S. citizens now need to be specifically singled out for military detention and denial of due process when under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force the president can apparently find the legal cover to serve as judge, jury and executioner to assassinate U.S. citizens, as he did in the killing of the cleric Anwar al-Awlaki in Yemen? Why is this bill necessary when the government routinely ignores our Fifth Amendment rights—“No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law”—as well as our First Amendment right of free speech? How much more power do they need to fight “terrorism”?
   Fear is the psychological weapon of choice for totalitarian systems of power. Make the people afraid. Get them to surrender their rights in the name of national security. And then finish off the few who aren’t afraid enough. If this law is not revoked we will be no different from any sordid military dictatorship. Its implementation will be a huge leap forward for the corporate oligarchs who plan to continue to plunder the nation and use state and military security to cow the population into submission.
   The oddest part of this legislation is that the FBI, the CIA, the director of national intelligence, the Pentagon and the attorney general didn’t support it. FBI Director Robert Mueller said he feared the bill would actually impede the bureau’s ability to investigate terrorism because it would be harder to win cooperation from suspects held by the military. “The possibility looms that we will lose opportunities to obtain cooperation from the persons in the past that we’ve been fairly successful in gaining,” he told Congress.
   But it passed anyway. And I suspect it passed because the corporations, seeing the unrest in the streets, knowing that things are about to get much worse, worrying that the Occupy movement will expand, do not trust the police to protect them. They want to be able to call in the Army. And now they can.
   PLUS:
   Chris Hedges Sues Obama Admin Over Indefinite Detention of U.S. Citizens Approved in NDAA

   Submitted by zeci on Mon, 01/23/2012 – 09:39
   in
   Ron Paul 2012
   Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Chris Hedges has filed suit against President Obama and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta to challenge the legality of the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes controversial provisions authorizing the military to jail anyone it considers a terrorism suspect anywhere in the world, without charge or trial.

   http://youtu.be/WoqLT5yqE1k

   ALSO SEE: http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obama-may-have-supplied-arms-used-in-benghazi-attack

   RICHARD SANDERS, 5 months ago Reply

Post Your Comment