Obama’s “Birth Announcement” Microfilm Reels Are Real Different
Posted by By Pamela Barnett at 6 November, at 06 : 51 AM Print
This article was produced as the result of research presented in the newly released Amazon e-book Obama Never Vetted: Unlawful President, The National Security Loopholes and Ensuing Conspiracy That Endanger America, and poses two important issues:
- Barack Obama’s “birth announcement” microfilm has been tampered with according to photographic evidence and examination.
- Original Obama “birth announcement” newspapers sold for a high price. If Obama’s birth announcements were in those papers, why hasn’t someone come forward with the newspapers?
First of all, if you haven’t already looked at Obama’s birth certificate at whitehouse.gov, you need to see with your own eyes that it is a forgery. The easiest way to tell this is to zoom to at least 800% into the alleged signature of his mother “Stanley Ann Dunham”. You can clearly see the difference in the different sections of the signature. For example, you can see what was a photocopy of a hand drawn section connected to a computer drawn solid black graphic section. The “State Registrar Stamp” is also a give away that it is a forgery, just look for the “X” instead of the “H” in the word “THE”. This anomaly did not exist until Obama’s alleged birth certificate was posted at whitehouse.gov.
Also, because this “Obama birth document” is allegedly typed in 1961 all of the typefaces should be the same for each typed letter. Look at the word “Student”, the lower case “t”’s are completely different shapes and in the name “Hussein” under father’s name the “U,I,N” are larger than the other letters. Someone working for Obama has lessened the quality and the sharpness from the original so these differences are harder to see than in the original. (More on this in a follow-on article.) The below snapshots are from the “birth document” posted at whitehouse.gov as of 11/4/12.
The “t”’s ARE DIFFERENT IN THE SAME WORD
THE “U, I, N” IN OBAMA’S FATHER’S MIDDLE NAME “HUSSEIN” ARE ALL LARGER THAN THE REST OF THE LETTERS. IT’S HARDER TO SEE ON THE UPDATED WHITEHOUSE.GOV VERSION THAN IT WAS WITH THE ORIGINAL THAT’S IN MY BOOK.
The PDF file at Whitehouse.gov was changed from the original one that was uploaded. The original file had multiple layers because it was a created document – it was created in layers. Currently, only a single layer pdf file of the birth certificate exists at whitehouse.gov so you cannot see numbers and letters disappearing and reappearing while zooming in and out anymore. However the above signs of forgery still remain. You can read what the experts have to say on Obama’s birth certificate forgery in my book.
THE ALLEGED OBAMA BIRTH ANNOUNCEMENT MICROFILMS
Regarding the microfilms, it has to be established that even if the Obama birth announcements were actually in the newspapers, it does not prove a Hawaii birth. Hawaii parents are/were able to file birth documents in Hawaii as long as they were residents, regardless of actual birth place of the child. Additionally, no proof was required of the birth, only a written statement had to be made. Section 57-40 of the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act in the 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii which was in effect in 1961, and other subsequent Hawaii birth laws that allow registration with no proof, or allow Foreign Birth registration, leaves an opening to claim Hawaii “birth” without it being true. In 1961 once a birth document was filed with the Hawaii Department of Health (including those situations mentioned above as well as from the hospitals), the HDOH automatically issued birth announcements to the Hononlulu Advertiser and Star Bulletin.
People that believe Obama was born in Hawaii typically rely on the microfilm printouts of the “alleged” Obama birth announcements from The Honolulu Star Advertiser and Star Bulletin. Talking heads like Bill O’Reilly, Fox News commentator, pose foolish, illogical questions like “Are we supposed to believe that Obama’s mother planted the birth certificate in 1961 in Hawaii because she wanted Obama to be President?” Maybe a better question would be “How many people from other countries come here illegally to specifically have their children born here so they can obtain U.S. citizenship and all its benefits?
However none of the alleged more prominent journalists/talking heads, like Bill O’Reilly and Chris Matthews (being the most prominent and most arrogant on the subject) have ever tried to find the original newspapers to confirm whether the microfilms are authentic. They just accepted what was fed to them by the Obama administration. See this clip of O’Reilly and Megyn Kelley show how foolish they are http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K74nIg4fyN8, and how foolish CNN is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SPxk-Emy0Og (about 7:40), and how foolish MSNBC Chris Matthews is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baH0fi2oVHs (about 3:11).
OBAMA “HAWAII BIRTH ANNOUNCEMENT” HONOLULU ADVERTISER 8/13/61
Microfilms are easy to crop, paste and replace a new forged reel with the old authentic original reel. I have been to several different libraries and have evaluated this possibility of switching out a reel. It would be very easy as security is minimal.
Unlike producing a forgery of a 1961 newspaper which would be extremely difficult if not impossible, producing a microfilm forgery would be relatively easy. Knowing this I tried to track down in Hawaii the newspapers that allegedly had Obama’s birth announcements within them and found that that some papers still existed in the 2007/2008 presidential campaign cycle. They were sold to a person unnamed by my contact for a high price according to him. He did not possess them, another antique dealer did. My contact did not know if Obama’s “birth announcements” actually appeared in the newspapers that were sold.
I was able to obtain two original 1961 Hawaii newspapers which include birth announcements from my antique dealer contact. I received five 1961 newspapers all in good to fair shape. Two of the papers obtained contained birth announcements that were completely intact. The existence of these two papers lends credibility to my antique dealer contact’s story of the Obama “birth announcement” newspapers having existed and having been sold.. After all, I just bought 5 newspapers from 1961. See below the photos of the newspaper birth announcements. One is from the Honolulu Star Bulletin dated January 27, 1961, and the other is from the Honolulu Advertiser dated May 5, 1961, just 3 months before Obama’s alleged birth announcements would have been printed.
Honolulu Star Bulletin, January 27, 1961, Front Page.
Photo by Pamela Barnett, Obama Never Vetted
Honolulu Star Bulletin, January 27, 1961, Birth Announcements
Photo by Pamela Barnett, Obama Never Vetted.
Honolulu Advertiser, May 5, 1961, Front Page
Photo by Pamela Barnett, Obama Never Vetted
Honolulu Advertiser, May 5, 1961, Birth Announcements
Photo by Pamela Barnett, Obama Never Vetted
If Why has no one come forward to help Obama by revealing the original newspapers with the announcement? Obama and his friends are millionaires, if Obama’s name was actually in those newspapers Obama or David Axelrod or Valerie Jarrett or George Soros would have found them at any cost and plastered them everywhere. There is no advantage of not showing these original newspapers unless the person who bought them is getting paid off not to show them because Obama’s announcements really aren’t there.
Donald Trump should offer a $5 million reward for either on of the alleged birth announcement dates: Hononlulu Advertiser, Aug. 13, 1961 and Star Bulletin, Aug. 14, 1961.
My theory is that Obama operatives could have created fake microfilms with Obama’s announcement added. There is a small finite number of microfilms to replace around the country (a search from awhile ago on worldcat.org came up with about 70-100 locations for the microfilms, but weren’t confirmed so there could actually be less), so replacing existing microfilms wouldn’t take too long. A microfilm printout with “Obama’s birth announcement” would have been more than enough “information” for Hawaii to say Obama was born there, especially with their extremely lax policies of handing out birth certificates.
Given the fact that Obama and his operatives produced a forged Hawaii birth certificate for display at the tax payer funded whitehouse.gov website, is it really not so hard to imagine that Obama and his operatives may have altered microfilms from 1961 and then took the forged reels of film and replaced them with the originals? Look for yourself at the photos below. Just another Obama coincidence from his background?
See below the tampered with microfilm from the California State Library. The California State Library Honolulu Advertiser microfilm for Obama’s alleged birth date was completely out of the ordinary. All of the microfilms were the same except two for 1961 the reel the contained Obama’s alleged birth announcement was a completely different color (dark brown when the rest were light gray) and texture (the reel was smooth and all of the rest had a textured finish). The other one was the same color, style, and texture and confirmed to be of the same era as the others by a reel manufacturer. Nothing was known about the Obama brown reel.
OBAMA’S ALLEGED BIRTH MONTH MICROFILM REEL IS REAL DIFFERENT
Photo by Pamela Barnett from book Obama Never Vetted: The Unlawful President, The National Security Loopholes and Ensuing Conspiracy That Endanger America. Obama’s “birth announcement” reel is the brown one with no film showing. Showing 5 consecutive months of Honolulu Advertiser 1961 reels. There are 2 reels per month.
OBAMA “BIRTH MONTH” REEL
Photo by Pamela Barnett, Obama Never Vetted
Note from Author Pamela Barnett:
This story contains some photos never seen by the public which will be added to the 2nd edition of the book Obama Never Vetted, The Unlawful President, The National Security Loopholes and Ensuing Conspiracy That Endanger America.
In a recent article posted by the American Thinker irregularities of the birth announcements are discussed. http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/10/are_obamas_1961_newspaper_birth_announcements_fake.html
[...] CPT Barnett published some research on Obama’s newspaper birth announcements here. [...]
It may go to the courts « bobsbox, 7 months ago
More awesome research Pamela, thank you. I’m fearful that this issue will be swept under the rug never to resurface no matter if Romney wins and the GOP takes both houses of Congress.
Elegy, 7 months ago
[...] Obama’s “Birth Announcement” Microfilm Reels Are Real Different!-Posted on ObamaBallotChallenge.com-By Pamela Barnett-On November 6, 2012: [...]
Where Is America Today? « A Nation ADrift-Why?, 7 months ago
Are you claiming that the birth announcements in both papers were forged? Forged in 1961? If so, why?
Or are you claiming that someone in 2008—when they were first noticed by Lori Starfeld––forged the microfilms? That would have meant since the primaries were still not over that a mere candidate for the nomination, a junior senator, was able to forge the microfilms of two newspapers in multiple libraries——not very likely is it.
Re “a small number of microfilms to replace.”
They would have had to have replaced the microfilms for each of the two newspapers, and to get the forged pages into the correct position with all the other articles in the newspapers in each of the microfilms in several different libraries, and they would not know how many libraries that it was in. They would have been in Hawaii, of course, but perhaps at university libraries elsewhere and certainly in the Library of Congress. And that would have had to have been done in 2008, when Obama was only a junior senator.
Moreover, the birth notices in the newspapers are only confirming evidence to (1) the birth certificate itself; (2) the repeated confirmation of the facts of it by the officials of both parties in Hawaii; (3) the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Kapiolani Hospital to a woman named Stanley; (4) the public Index Data file; and (5) the INS investigation of Obama’s father’s status in the late 1960s or early 1970s that concludes that he is the father of a child born in the USA.
smrstrauss, 7 months ago
You mean the “birth announcements” which have never been vetted, show no name, place of birth and have a false address? The newspapers have common ownership, management and are located in the same building. Check out their political orientation while you’re at it.
- The birth certificates are PROVEN forgeries
- The SS/Draft registration is a PROVEN forgery
- He has used multiple Social Security numbers not his, but linked to his name. Verified by multiple professional private investigators, using multiple commercial financial databases and accepted techniques.
- Both newspapers are owned by the same company.
- NO hospital will take credit for birthing him
- His own literary biography for 13 years, through all revisions, under two different companies, claimed he was born in Kenya, as did his maternal grandmother, Kenyan legislature and Ambassador and more.
- Bill Ayers’ postman says his wife told him Obama was foreign student
- He has totally refused to release any college, school, travel, State Dept., work, scholarship, financial or medical records, which would clear this up IMMEDIATELY. What is he hiding?
LOOK at the evidence.
GeorgeM, 7 months ago
Considering Barry’s Grandmother Madelyn Dunham VP of Bank of Hawaii also volunteered her time at the Library working in Microfilms as well as volunteering for the Courthouse working in the records department this is totally plausible. Motive and opportunity both existed.
Tonya Franklin, 4 months ago