OBAMA’S KENYAN BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES (?)

Posted by By at 19 July, at 18 : 55 PM Print

OBAMA’S KENYAN BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES (?)

Not a slam dunk, but more evidence on “Obama” Kenyan birth

 

WHERE LIES GO TO DIE – Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives.

(Editors note:  The records eluded to in this story were discovered through a May, 2012 search through BMD Registers, a BNA partner site, using the search term “Obama”.  Corroborating evidence through public sources only implicates the identity of those involved but does not explicitly prove their identity in the absence of the availability of original documents.)

By Dan Crosby
of The Daily Pen 
KEW, SURREY, GB – The last place anyone would think to look for a birth record of someone claiming to be a “natural born” U.S. citizen is Great Britain.  The very inclusion of the Article II eligibility mandate in the U.S. Constitution was explicitly intended by the founding fathers of America to prevent a then British-born enemy usurper from attaining the office of the U.S. presidency and thereby undermining the sovereignty of the newly formed nation.

Ballot News Blog, Uncategorized ,

Related Posts

8 Comments

  1. A US BC doesn’t help Obama. His Father was a BRIT.

    Robert Laity, 10 months ago Reply

  2. Sean Hannity said on his 7-19-12 Radio Show that Sheriff Arpaio would be his guest on his TV show at 9PM. Arpaio did not show up. I would think that Sean’s announcement was genuine. So I called Arpaio’s office and asked the girl who answered the phone why the Sheriff didn’t appear. She put me on hold and then returned telling me he never was scheduled to appear

    ?????????

    Jim Black, 10 months ago Reply

  3. [...] KEW, SURREY, GB – The last place anyone would think to look for a birth record of someone claiming to be a “natural born” U.S. citizen is Great Britain.  The very inclusion of the Article II eligibility mandate in the U.S. Constitution was explicitly intended by the founding fathers of America to prevent a then British-born enemy usurper from attaining the office of the U.S. presidency and thereby undermining the sovereignty of the newly formed nation.Source: obamaballotchallenge.com [...]

    Charities and their records for family historians, 10 months ago Reply

  4. With all the questions about BHO’s past, why isn’t CONGRESS screaming for a true investigation. Are there that many puppets in DC? Sickening there is no honesty or decency left, just a bunch of stupid sheeples

    Katy Ishee, 9 months ago Reply

    • The answer to your question “why isnt CONGRESS screaming…?” is simple. They believe the Hawaii birth certificate, and the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties and the Index Data and the notices sent to the newspapers in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii—-all of which show that Obama was born in the USA.

      tnugent, 8 months ago Reply

      • Nugent, we know that they’re not all that dumb. Some have told is that the election is the way to address it (forget all the horrible precedents set and four years of misery), or they think they may lose some votes, or think the courts won’t do anything. The birth certificate image on the White House web site is a proven forgery and a short form certification can be obtained in HI with only an affidavit.

        So far, he has shopwn no valid leagl proof of eligibility. That is especially difficult, since his father was a foreigner. Read up on eligibility: http://art2superpac.com/issues.html

        GeorgeM, 8 months ago Reply

  5. Only birther “experts”—who have not shown that they are real experts, and who certainly have not shown that they are fair and impartial—have claimed that there is anything wrong with Obama’s birth certificate. That is why the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona, who recently checked on the facts on Obama’s birth certificate and accepted the confirmation of Hawaii and ruled that Obama will be on the ballot in Arizona does not believe the birther claims. That is why Ann Coulter and the National Review call birthers CRAZY.

    Further to the “research in the British national archives claim.”

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/08/amazing-fact-found-in-the-national-archives-birthers-will-believe-anything/

    tnugent, 8 months ago Reply


Post Your Comment

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE