Obama’s Occidental College Records Subpoened

Posted by By at 4 December, at 03 : 29 AM Print

Obama’s Occidental College Records Subpoened

No, we don’t know if will be upheld, but this is LONG overdue.

Note: I placed in reader comments section a note that this is just a draft, provided by Orly to assist Mr. Sibley. Orly is volunteering her services to multiple plaintiffs/attorneys. Lesson learned: readers do not necessarily read the reader comments section.- GeorgeM

Read on Orly Taitz site: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=364003

 

See previous Posting on Sibley case

 

From Plaintiff Montgomery Sibley:

My quixotic run for President in 2012 isover.  My obligation to challenge the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, II to be President is not.  I can use your help to defray the litigation costs which, as you can see below, are substantial:

 

 
I have now filed three lawsuits in the District of Columbia challenging Obama’s eligibility to be President. The first Complaint – Sibley vs. Obama – invokes the ancient writ of quo warranto to have the U.S. District Court compel Mr. Obama to demonstrate that he is eligible for the office of President. The questionable certificates of live births released by Mr. Obama, his questionable social security number and selective service registration and his refusal to authorize release of his college transcripts which would establish his status as a citizen are all brought to the Court’s attention by the Complaint. Everyone else in these United States has to demonstrate as required by USCS § 1324a they are U.S. Citizens in order to be employed, why not Mr. Obama before he is employed by us as our President?

The second Complaint – Sibley vs. Alexander,  Dinan and Lightfoot – is a class action complaint filed in D.C. Superior Court against the District of Columbia members of the so-called Electoral College as class representatives of the so-called Electoral College.  The Complaint seeks an injunction preventing any and all of the 538 Electors authorized by the Twelfth and Twenty-Third Amendments to the Constitution from casting their votes for an ineligible candidate, i.e., Mr. Obama.  My Motion for Preliminary Injunction was heard at a hearing on November 29, 2012 by Judge John Mott.  Significantly, I had served subpoenas duces tecum on Mr. Obama to produce his original birth certificates at the hearing.  Mr. Obama ignored the subpoenas.  Consequently, I have filed a motion to hold him in Contempt-of-Court.  That motion is under consideration by Judge Mott.

The third suit, Sibley v D.C. Board of Election invokes an obscure D.C. law that allows a D.C. voter to mount a post-election challenge to an elected officials qualification for office.  This suit expressly grants legal “standing” to a D.C. voter — the legal bar which has been raised by the government to all previous challenges to Obama’s eligibility.

Thanks!

Ballot News Blog, Washington, D.C.

Related Posts

19 Comments

  1. This was a draft and is not the actual subpoena, which is being handled via Mr. Sibley’s office.

    GeorgeM, 5 months ago Reply

  2. [...] the Subpoena:  http://www.obamaballotchallenge.com  or http://www.orlytaitzesq.com     /*   About [...]

    Subpoena Granted for Obama’s Occidental College Records :: Minute Men News, 5 months ago Reply

  3. Don’t confine your inquiry to Occidental College. Get Columbia to open up their Obama/Soetoro files, also. If Obama tries to block, block inauguration.

    Edward A. Ross, Jr., 5 months ago Reply

  4. As other commentators are posting here this is not only a draft it is Orly’s draft. Your article is false. You complain of MSM false stories why do you not hold yourself to the same standard. Report this acurately and truthfully. Otherwise you are no better than the corrupt MSM. On top of that this same thing was tried in 2009 (Not sure of date) At that time the judge DID SIGN off on a subpena. Occidental acknowledged the subpena as authoritative, They then immediately contacted Obama’s attorney’s and his attorneys got the subpena quashed. So please publish the truth. ‘t get people’s hopes up based on a lie.

    Roger Sharp, 5 months ago Reply

    • Calm down young fella. I was the one who posted a comment explaining that it was a draft. Did you read it?

      GeorgeM, 5 months ago Reply

  5. To Edward A. Ross, Jr.: Remember the official inauguration will be done in private, at the White House, on Sunday, January 20, 2013. The public appearance and supposed swearing in ceremony on Monday, January 21 is just to allow the public to see a reenactment of the oath of inauguration, plus all the hoopla of speeches, the parade, and inaugural balls on a day that isn’t a Sunday. This is in keeping with previous inaugurations when the Constitutionally mandated day falls on a Sunday. I fear it would be impossible to stop the official inauguration from happening, by any peaceful protest, no matter how large the mass of protesters.

    Connie Nourse, 5 months ago Reply

    • Connie Nourse,

      Thank-you for taking the time to comment. If the “illegal alien” is under the articles of impeachment, there will NOT be an inauguration (and protests will not be necessary). We, The People, WILL rejoice, and be glad!

      J. M. Lukes, 5 months ago Reply

  6. All of this would not be necessary if we had a congressional make up that would honestly vet and make him prove his legitimacy. Our elected officials have betrayed America. Going into a second term and not a word from anyone in congress about this. Why won’t they make him prove who/what he is? Cowardice because they didn’t do it the first time? Do it now!

    Neal R Wooley, 5 months ago Reply

  7. See my eye witness account of President Obama born in Topeka, Ks and how he was never told the truth of his birth, murder of real Dad in a racial hate attack on both and marriage to Obama Sr a couple of months before birth arranged by my Dad so she could have a marriage certificate and he to say in USA, Starts 7/26/.12 and in Daily recaps since. 9/14/12 is my affidavit with Kris Kobach Sec of State of Ks and if Orly Taitz had asked for court order in pending case in Topeka Ks; the only issue would have been did you know and when. I was stopped from telling hi,m by his maternal grandmother in 1/71 as she went into a racial tirade. Writings quoting him indicate the same thing may have happened to him when he tried to ask.
    The Forbes Air force base birth records are on a separate data base and if his attorneys had asked for these in the past may have been missed as this closed base was not in city limits the. My mother took her to the hospital to have him and her water broke getting there. I’m doing this to get truth out, not for politics.
    Children have to be told where they came from. in this case three dead on banks of Ks River have had no justice for 50 years. And law enforcement was often part of KKK. Posted 9/26/12 is my letter to AG Holder asking for justice for a former class mate of mine, the real Dad that’s never been publicized, Linda Joy Adams.

    Linda Joy Adams, 5 months ago Reply

    • You are an omnipresent troll elsewhere on the ‘net. But, we’ll give you one and only one shot to prove your case, which is more than anyone ever gave us. Sounds like there’s even less proof of a Kansas birth than a Hawaiian one. Unless you have some more substantiation, please stay off this site until you do. otherwise, it’s troll begone.

      - So, who was the real Dad and what proof do you have? You say in another posting in Salina Local News 10/3 that “Ann’s Dad was not Stanley Dunham but Daniel Wayne Pope.” Are you aware that Stanley is his alleged mother, not father? LOL.
      - Where is the real b/c?
      - Where are the hospital records?
      - Where are the witnesses?
      - Any photos? They did have cameras way back in 1961, you know.

      GeorgeM, 5 months ago Reply

    • IF WHAT YOU SAY IS TRUE, THEN YOU ARE PROVING OVOMIT IS A LIAR FROM DAY ONE. HIS CLAIM TO HAVE A BIRTH CERTIFICATE FROM HAWAII IS NOW REALLY A LIE BASED ON YOUR CLAIMS. NO ONE CAN BELIEVE ANYTHING HE SAYS. GO GET A LIFE YOU MORON….

      DAY, 5 months ago Reply

      • .. and that makes me a moron, how, “DAY?” Take your meds, fella.

        GeorgeM, 5 months ago Reply

  8. [...] more here and [...]

    Subpoena Granted for Obama’s Occidental College Records « 5 Pt. Salt, 5 months ago Reply

  9. “Everyone else in these United States has to demonstrate as required by USCS § 1324a they are U.S. Citizens in order to be employed, why not Mr. Obama before he is employed by us as our President?”

    I had to fill out an I9 for employment. To do that, I ordered my BC from Los Angeles. They sent me a certificate with raised stamp, that verified the existence of an original birth certificate (I was born in West Hollywood, CA). It had all the details of my birth, as recorded on the original. I was hired.

    Now you say that Mr. Obama should do the same since we all do that. Well, he has done that. And to the satisfaction of independent forensic experts — but not to the satisfaction of partisan non-experts like scanner salesmen and users of Adobe Illustrator (which I and a zillion other non-experts use as well, every day).

    The problem with all of you is that this is about your politics and nothing more. If it were really about forgery vs. non-forgery, YOU WOULD GET A REAL FORENSIC, COURT-ACCEPTED EXPERT to say so. FIRST HAND. So far, no one has and silly little press conferences about “beliefs” of a partisan, controversial sheriff in an obscure county or Arizona is hearsay, at best.

    We are a country of laws. That is why opinions of wing-nut scanner salesman are just that. USE A REAL EXPERT. (Oh, there isn’t one who agrees with you. There’s the rub. You really don’t want an expert.)

    Silly Rabbit, 5 months ago Reply

    • A passive-aggressive obot pretending to be a patriot doesn’t fool us for a NY second.

      First, obot, a digital image on a website is valid legal proof of ….nothing.

      There is no such thing as a “REAL FORENSIC, COURT-ACCEPTED EXPERT.” for digital images. Yes, we checked. Doug Vogt, Paul Irey and others are just as knowledgeable as the best. There is also an official investigation which agrees with them and provides further overwhelming corroboration.

      If you hadn’t just parachuted in from la-la land to make your foolish pronouncement here, you would already know that. We have excellent Constitutional reasons, which would probably not care about, for not wanting the Marxist usurper who is without undivided allegiance to the USA, its Constitution. spirit, laws, customs, traditions, hopes and dreams.

      It is interesting that teams of obots descended onto the Internet to fight this battle so fiercely. What are so so afraid of? You “won,” didn’t you, as “Barry” is so fond of saying. I guess he at least has a sufficient grasp of history to know that he’s far from home-free, looking back at Nixon, who won 49 states and still got bounced out. What Obama has done is far, far worse than Tricky Dick’s Watergate college-style prank.

      By the way, there is no vetting process for federal elected officials. Read Capt. Pamela Barnett’s book, “”Obama Never Vetted…”

      GeorgeM, 5 months ago Reply


Post Your Comment

Performance Optimization WordPress Plugins by W3 EDGE