Orly Taitz Drags Occidental College into Court Thursday 11-1 at High Noon Over Obama/Soetoro College Records!
Posted by By GeorgeM at 31 October, at 23 : 05 PM Print
EX PARTE MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS FROM A THIRD PARTY WITNESSES UNDER
CALIFORNTA CODE ,OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 2O3I3IO
I. MOTION TO COMPEL STUDENT APPLICATION BY CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA OF I’TS APPLICATION
AND REGISTRATION TO OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE LOCATED IN LOS ANGELES CA.
Plaintiff,
2. MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION BY LOS ANGELES TIMES A VIDEOTAPE OF A SPEECH GIVEN BY
BARACK OBAMA AT THE GOING AWAY PARTY FOR HIS FRIEND. FORMER SPOKESPERSON FOR PLO
RASHID KHALIDI
Related Correspondence from Defendant
Notice of intent to oppose ex parte applicationTo: Carl Botterud a href=”mailto:botterud@oxy.edu”>botterud@oxy.edu>please see attached subpoena
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Carl Botterud a href=”mailto:botterud@oxy.edu”>botterud@oxy.edu> wrote:
Dr. Taitz,
This email confirms that I spoke with you via telephone on October 31, 2012 at approximately 1:40 p.m. In that conversation, I told you that I intend to appear tomorrow in Dept. C-19 of the Orange County Superior Court on behalf of Occidental College to oppose the ex parte application filed by you in case no 30-2012
I told you that it is the College’s position that your application is without merit, frivolous, and warrants sanctions.
I would respectfully ask that you withdraw your application and not proceed with the scheduled hearing, Should you decide to do so, please advise me as soon as possible.
Respectfully,
Carl Botterud
Carl A. Botterud
General Counsel
OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE
1600 Campus Rd. F-58
Los Angeles, CA 90041
(323) 259-1441 (office)
(626) 824-2668 (text/mobile)
Maybe we will have an October surprise here………..
Orville Covert, 7 months ago
Tomorrow’s November already
GeorgeM, 7 months ago
She is good, but the trouble is our judges are in treason when it’s time to defend our constitution.
Aleks, 7 months ago
No, she’s not, and those judges (and the administration) know it. She may be a good dentist, but she’s a lousy lawyer and apparently has never had any good training in case strategy and tactics. She also screws up the language of her motions/pleadings so badly that I’m sure even the judges have trouble trying to figure out what she is saying and wants.
Being a Russian-born Jew, and immigrant to Israel at (age 20?) then to the US only recently in ’87, she’s obviously been subjected to at least two foreign languages during her youth, each with their own peculiar idioms, syntax and language processing – and that is not helping her. In fact, it’s helping the administration. All they have to do is hire attorneys in each state who can run circles around her and point out the many errors she’s made in both procedure and filings which get the cases moved to jurisdictions and venues she doesn’t want them in – and eventually gets the cases thrown out. The Mississippi case is only one example. This document is another, as she can’t even get the language of what she’s asking for (compulsion to produce) correct in the very first two paragraphs, nor is she having the document proof-read for simple grammatical and spelling errors. Then again, there’s all the money in the world available to the fed attorneys, so all they have to do is keep throwing money at the “problem”.
Doesn’t matter whether the judges are corrupt (no question there – I’ve seen it in court many times), she’s just screwing things up and making the “birther” issue the farce that the Dems keep calling it. Not that it isn’t a key issue, it’s just that she (or anybody else for that matter) has never taken it into the proper jurisdiction/venue and argued it properly. This gets her a lot of TV and press/internet coverage, but does us no good.
Sometimes I wonder who she’s really working for . . .
Jules, 7 months ago
You are completely right. I have come to the conclusion that Orly has probably done more bad than good towards disclosure of Obama. She was all we had for a long time and now that we have good lawyers with the ballot challenge group she should either join forces for help or give up. I don’t know of one thing that Orly has accomplished in her 4 years except keeping the issue alive. I am not aware of one single case that she has actually won.
Melvin E. Holliday, 7 months ago
Actually, she only made you think she was all we had. We have Mario Apuzzo, Larry Klayman, Van Irion, Gary Kreep, Mark Hatfield, Phil Berg, Leo Donofrio, Greg Black and others. True, Orly has worked on more cases, but quantity does not equal quality. I’m aware of some good work she did, such as the NH ballot challenge, even if they refused to obey their own laws.
GeorgeM, 7 months ago
Sounds like how the Democratic Headquarters in Phoenix acted when they were served with papers from Van Irion. I would have loved to have been there that day. They had served the papers to someone who was sitting in their office & playing games on one of their computers. I guess one of the people who were in charge saw what they had left & she came running out screaming at them with the summons in her hands. Saying that they couldn’t serve them a summons & I guess they told her that they were already served. The woman got so frustrated that she threw the papers in the street & stomped on them.
azjen, 7 months ago
There are persons designated by law who are authorized to accept service of process. The guy sitting in the office of the Democratic Headquarters in Phoenix was not one of them. If you didn’t serve the correct person, you don’t have valid service, Jen. How many times has Orly been told this?
It would be interesting to know who was served at Occidental. Was it the guy or gal sitting at the desk?
Jillian Wilson, 7 months ago
This is going to be good. Good in the way that Pammy won’t get to testify since Orly screwed up and didn’t notify the court which requires 5 days notice prior to the hearing. It’s also going to be good because their attorney has been brought up to date on all of Orly’s litigation. Do we sanctions on Orly? Perhaps and very likely.
James, 7 months ago
Tick tock losers, in 5 days Obama will be reelected, too bad so sad for you punks.
Biffer, 7 months ago
We’ll see, turkey.
GeorgeM, 7 months ago
We’ll be seeing a lot of birfer tears come next Wednesday morning.
Glad to see so many birfers wasted their money and time on this ballot challenge crapolla.
James, 7 months ago
Yes, tears of joy.
GeorgeM, 7 months ago
If Obama gets reelected it will confirm that we have as a nation been taken over by the ignorant. Anyone with half a brain can figure out that all Obama cares about is himself. He and Michelle are our most costly welfare recipients.
Rita, 7 months ago
And Orly is sanctioned $4,000 today in addition to having the subpoena quashed. She now owes Occidental that money for their attorney fees and they’re going to come after her.
Expect more sanctions for Orly coming soon. Everyone is tired of the birthers and it is time to remove the crown of the queen permanently.
James, 7 months ago
Jimmy – by using the term “birther” or any variant of it you self identify as a very shallow, biased, juvenile and foolish person with low intellectual ability.
Guest, 7 months ago
I’ll second that. If you’re going to be a guest here, James, keep a civil tongue in your head/keyboard, or you’re outta here and stick to facts, with speculation clearly labeled as such.
GeorgeM, 7 months ago
George, when was the subpoena served on Occidental, and to whom was it directed?
Jennifer, 7 months ago
I am not at liberty to disclose that, but I personally know both people on the service team and talked with them the day they served.
GeorgeM, 7 months ago
Have not received a direct report from our sources, but heard that motion was denied and sanctions were levied.
GeorgeM, 7 months ago
This is not the country we were born into when something so important to the public’s interest is treated this way by the court. We have fallen so far that there is little recourse left.
Rita, 7 months ago
[...] Previous posting on this case: [...]
Taitz V Obama Hearing Held in CA Superior Court in Santa Ana, 7 months ago
Poor Orly has no clue at all how to serve subpoena’s, once again she stuffed it up and had to pay $4000 to Occidental. When will she learn how to serve subpoena’s, what expert witness’s actually are and you need facts for a court case, not lies!
Derek, 7 months ago
Obot, although I share your opinion of her mastery of legal procedures, you don’t have the whole story on the subpoenas. She had expert witnesses. She had facts. The forged birth certificate, forged SS/draft registration, stolen Social Security numbers, E-Verify fail, foreign father, legal NBC argument, etc are very real.
GeorgeM, 7 months ago