Orly Taitz Interview in Mississippi
Posted by By GeorgeM at 29 September, at 05 : 14 AM Print
We’re just showing the interview and leave it to you to judge it. Win or lose, Orly is getting the word out to many people, which will help decide the election, even if our officials refuse to do their jobs. We are recording it all fort posterity. Names, dates, actions.
On Sept. 24th 2012 Dr. Orly Taitz appeared at a hearing in Jackson, MS at the Federal Court. Many motions were on the docket. To conclude briefly, which I will update later, the case brought by Dr. Taitz against Barack H. Obama for not being eligible to serve as president and for a number of forged documents, will remain in Federal Court. The federal defendants are now being served and Dr. Taitz will be answering a motion for a Judgement on the Pleadings.
Please call Sheriff Joe Arpaio, he must testify in KS next week Oct. 3, 2012. This will probably be the last hearing before the election. His investigation concluded that Obama’s bc and selective service record are forgeries. Now he has to subject himself to cross-examination so that his findings can be admitted into evidence.
I have said it before and I’ll say it again Orly Taitz will go down in history as one of the greatest American Patriots . She may not be the best court room lawyer but she is a patriot . If this nation is saved from going down it will be because of people like Ms . Taitz who are standing up for the US Constitution and the rule of law .
Charles, 7 months ago
We agree with Charles. We must get the word out that Obama is NOT eligible. And we, too, are listing all the traitors in Congress, the courts & other high places who are betraying their oaths to the Constitution.
William Homolka, Editor & CEO,
USIntel.net
William Homolka, 7 months ago
If one is going to take the time to reply to something that I’ve said/written ; then I’d suseggt that the same- take time enough (however much may be required) to not only read, BUT, FULLY COMPREHEND the ideas, the points , my words were intended to impart to the readerTo wit: Why, on Earth, would I provide some quotes from the Founders/Framers re born in the U.S. of two citizen parents’Hint #1 Ya ain’t gonna find any ; not from the core group, at leastBECAUSE:It is not what was meant. While, certainly, the overwhelming majority of ARTICLE II natural born Citizens’ would and will be of this lineage, verifiable. The F/F’s deliberately avoided such restrictive, short-sighted, illiberal language. The term , again, employed NATURAL Apparently, many of you including the monitor of this site remain in the dark as to why OUR Nation’s Founders Constitution’s Framers chose to be so circumspectNOW, I hate to come across as patronizing but really folks, I and my mates figured all of this out as kids; 6th & 7th grade-schoolers.. So I will provide you with another hint rather than take your hand and walk you through the whole thingHINT #2 Foundlings’ children born of unknown parentage &/or indeterminate origins Of issue ,yesteryear and still today, in spite of the advent of genetic testing DNA etcAGAIN, FOLKS NATURAL NATURAL NATURAL natural~ the classification of organisms (eg. U.S. Citizens) according to relationships based on descent from a common ancestorONE U.S. CITIZEN+ONE NON-U.S. CITIZEN?ONE (ARTICLE II) natural born Citizen’natural~ faithful rendition of the original, unequivocalThe above equation yields a product which speaks with equal voice and is far from being faithful to its original constitution(in this case, a U.S. Citizen)This is so elementary, I have treated on ALL , ages ago; the mis-construed, the mis-apprehensions , contrivances, perversions, exploitations and on and onP.S. Swift’s comments, by-the-way, haven’t A THING to do with ARTICLE II Presidential Elg Reqs. However, this citation of yours does serve as a prime example/illustration of what I refer to above
Karzan, 7 months ago
Sorry, “mate,” wrong. Read: art2superpac.com/issues.html
GeorgeM, 7 months ago