By Chris Strunk
On April 13, 2012 the Decision with order to show cause in the case before the Justice Arthur Schack known for his mortgage foreclosure clerking here in Brooklyn New York Supreme Court, held that I am guilty of frivolous conduct and to be sanctioned in amount approaching $500,000 with loss of the ability to file state court cases for challenging the fraud in the 2008 election here in New York; as is challenged under a six years statute of limitations and personalized as to me rather than a general injury when the NYS BOE arbitrarily redefined the instructions for a candidate to run for POTUS from NBC to ” Born a Citizen” .
The NYS BOE and state officers facilitated ballot access of the SWP candidate Roger Calero is a foreigner, McCain is born a citizen overseas and Barack Hussein Obama Soebarkah with a British Subject father assumed top be born in Hawaii now appears not, were all allowed on the 2008 ballot and to fund raise currently against the interest of the State of New York Legislature with US Constitution Article 2 plenary power to select an Electoral College exclusively from New York according to McPherson v Blacker (1892) that has remained unchanged.
IN the Decision the Judge attacked me as sanctionable for using not only the current NYS Statutory definition (RPL Section 18) with several citations going back 200 years here in the state of NBC but the definition of NBC as being according to the SCOTUS in Minor v . Happerset (1875) A person born in the USA of citizen parents that implies to mean citizens are either natural born citizens or naturalized per se. Whereas Justice Schack defends the use of the term “Born a Citizen” that is the 14th amendment definition. Attorney Mario Apuzzo filed an amicus in the case to protect his own case in the system in other venues, and although I do not agree with some on Mario’s characterizations, he nevertheless is entitled to his opinion; however Mario’s argument as to the underlining matters for which I were to be sanctioned as wrongheaded by the court are considered accurate and applicable see http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/05/new-york-state-court-should-not.html
At the hearing on May 7, 2012 the judge was challenged by me to recuse as he had used a straw-man argument to convict me in what can only be a Star chamber proceeding and for which I will be filing a notice of appeal by May 23, 2012, at which time the transcript and issues on appeal will be made available.