Taitz Reports Setback, Then Progress in Indiana
Posted by By GeorgeM at 8 August, at 21 : 29 PM Print
I have not verified any of this. Just reporting what was sent.– George
Great news in Indiana, Judge Reid reverses her prior ruling and allows me to proceed on 3 out of 4 causes of action against the Sec of State and Elections Commission: Fraud, Breach of Fiduciary duty and Negligence for allowing Obama on the ballot with forged IDs
Posted on | August 8, 2012 | No Comments
Small note before I provide the hearing report. It looks like one of 4 members of the elections commission, Sarah Steel Reardon, resigned from the commission.
This was a hectic day, but things are looking up!
I got up at 4 am yesterday and drove to LA and flew to Phoenix and from there to Indianapolis. I landed at 3:30 and immediately headed to court. I expected 3 motions to be on the docket, but only one, rule 60 motion, was on the docket. I was horrified to see that one important motion, Motion for a leave of court to proceed as relators on writ of mandamus and quo warranto was not docketed, even thought it was received by certified mail and signed by the chief clerk, Elizabeth White, however the opposition to this motion, signed by the Deputy attorney General, Jefferson Garn, was there. I inquired the clerk, as to what happened, she told me to go to the clerk downstairs. The clerk downstairs said that she is closing. Another serious problem was the fact that the deputy AG Garn filed his opposition yesterday, one day before the hearing, knowing that I will be in flight and unable to file my reply. I sprinted to the office of AG. I have to thank Mr. Swihart for helping. They were closing the building, so I just spotted a couple of attorneys getting out of the building and asked them to help me. The let me in through the side door and one of the employees was able to located the leadings by Garn and copy them. From there I went to Fedex Kinkos and proceeded woring on the pleading. I had my reply ready in the morning and I filed it with the judge one hour before the hearing.
At the hearing the judge agreed with me and ruled that I can proseed on the causes of action for Fraud, Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Negligence against the Secretary of State and the Elections Commission. Only one cause of action, dealing with the agency appeal, I will refile later, when the general election filing period starts.
This is great news. Actually during the hearing at one point the judge told me on the record: ”it looks like you know what you are doing” . This is the first time I see the judge reconsidering her prior ruling. I am currently at the airport waiting for my flight. The judge assigned to me to draft her proposed order and submit to her signature. When you get to draft the proposed order, it’s like a victory lap and I will be delighted to run it. I will post the papers when I get back to my office tomorrow. I, also, am preparing for the Ca hearing on Friday before judge Gee. I hope that you can come to the hearing on Friday, 9 am, US District Court Los Angeles.
Also, I will need to fly to Indiana again and your donations and frequent flier miles are badly needed, so I can continue the fight. Keep in mind, press conferences are not sufficient to remove Obama from the ballot. We need a decision by the judge or the jury. We are on the right track, we need to keep pushing until the truth comes out and Obama is prosecuted for elections fraud and use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, cases are still active– need your help NOW!
Support the Florida and Other Ballot Challenges!
Constitution Action Fund (If you want to contribute to Orly, do it on her site, not here)
Even if you don’t donate, at least click and read the above.
What is the Article II Legal Defense Fund? Find out.
Only a natural born Citizen can legally be President of the USA. ”Obama” is not either.
Subscribe free to ObamaBallotChallenge.com. Please forward. We’re also on Facebook
Hang in there Orly you are doing a great job and We The People Thank You
charles17121, 9 months ago
“I have not verified any of this. Just reporting what was sent.– George”
The only thing Orly reports correctly is that her Rule 60 motion was denied.
Judge Reid did not reverse on any issue. Orly never asked for nor was she ever granted leave to file her Second Amended Complaint. Therefore, it was never before the Court and had never been ruled on. It was not part of the ruling dismissing the case.
Judge Reid could have dismissed it at the hearing, but it would necessarily have been without prejudice and Orly could have merely refiled. Instead, she allowed Orly to file (amend) within 30 days of the hearing.
Procedurally, she will file. The opposition then will (most likely) file their motions to dismiss. Orly can then respond, then the opposition can file a reply. The judge will then most likely set a hearing date to hear the motions to dismiss. That will then be heard.
Contrary to Orly’s pronouncement on Mark Gillar’s show that this now gives her the opportunity to subpoena the world and the HI DOH and original BC, that is not so. This is no different than any previous procedure of an initial filing. There will be no discovery, no evidentiary hearing until and unless the motions to dismiss are denied, which is highly unlikely, considering the claims being asserted.
Orly also has to draft a proposed Order based on the judge’s ruling at the hearing, setting out the denial of the Rule 60 Motion and the ruling allowing her to amend. She has 10 days from the hearing date to do so.
Frank Bolivar, 9 months ago