The Faux Claims of John Woodman Regarding the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause
Posted by By GeorgeM at 3 April, at 04 : 02 AM Print
above: Philadelphia Lawyer Horace Binney
By Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
April 2, 2012
What is hilarious is how John Woodman, who claims to be a conservative Republican, is running around the internet proclaiming that he has saved the United States, its Constitution, and not only putative President Barack Obama, but also Republicans, Sen. Marco Rubio and Sen. Bobby Jindal (all three were not born to citizen parents, both of whom are citizens of the United States at the time of their birth) from the “Birthers.” He adds that he has proven that Attorney Leo Donofrio’s and my position on the definition of a “natural born Citizen” is nothing but “lies.”
There is plenty of historical evidence that I have provided which shows that John Woodman is nothing more than a creation of his own mind and rhetoric. I have shown that history and legal precedents do not support what he and some others maintain is the definition of a “natural born Citizen,” i.e., any child simply born in the United States, regardless of the citizenship of the parents. I have shown that at the Founding, unlike the states which put in place statutes and state constitutions which retained the English common law on the state level except to the degree those laws were abrogated by the state legislature, the national government did not adopt the English common law for the needs of the national government, but rather the law of nations which was natural law applied to the affairs of nations. In fact, unlike the states, there is nothing in the Constitution or any Act of Congress which suggests that the English common law continued to have any effect on the national level. I have shown that in that connection, we adopted the definition of a “natural-born citizen” as provided by Emer de Vattel in his The Law of Nations, Section 212 (London 1797) (1st ed. Neuchatel 1758), where he tells us:
more….
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2012/04/faux-claims-of-john-woodman-regarding.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Support the Florida and Other Ballot Challenges!
What is the Article II Legal Defense Fund? Find out.
Only a natural born Citizen can legally be President of the USA. ”Obama” is not either.
Subscribe free to ObamaBallotChallenge.com. Please forward. We’re also on Facebook
You all have to know that this Mr Woodman is an Obot paid by this illegal obama administration to get on the internet and lie about the US Constitution and what it means to be Natural Born US Citizen . And for those of you who don’t know , the democrats in congress tried to change Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the US Constitution no less then eight times without success sense 2003 . Again Article 2 states the qualifications for anyone to hold the office of US President.
They have to be a Natural Born US Citizen. And that means born to two US citizens parents as one of the provisions of the Article .
Charles, 1 year ago
RIGHT ON, CHARLES. DEBUNK THIS FOOL OBOT
Nancy Russell, 1 year ago
George,
Has anyone got any feed back from Joe Arpaio on his man Zullu testifying for Orly Taitz? Looks kinda like Orly wants all the credit for taking him (Obama) down. I hope that isn’t Joe’s reason too but they need to do something quick as that court date is a week away. She has been working on this probably longer than anyone but this needs to be a TEAM EFFORT George. If you polled everyone at the conference last Saturday I’ll lay you odds they would say go for it!!!
Orville Covert, 1 year ago
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0088_0162_ZO.html
WAITE, C.J., Opinion of the Court
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
——————————————————————————–
88 U.S. 162
Minor v. Happersett
——————————————————————————–
Argued: February 9, 1875 — Decided: March 29, 1875
——————————————————————————–
The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of the court.
> Please note this is a Supreme Court decision of 1875.
> Last week the Supreme Court on Monday March 26, 2012 heard arguments on an obscure law of 1869 that could hold up any Supreme Court review until 2016. I’ve gathered that won’t fly in 2012.
Dynahog, 1 year ago
Minor v. Happersett is a classic in which the “natural born citizen” definition is reiterated by the Chief Justice.
The case itself is historic on a different topic.
Dynahog, 1 year ago
The Canada Free Press Reports That Threats And Intimidation Tactics Are Being Used To Keep The Media Silent About Obama’s Forged Identity Papers.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45758
Bloodless Coup, 1 year ago
[...] The Faux Claims of John Woodman Regarding the “Natural Born Citizen” Clause!-Posted on Obama Ballot Challenge-By GeorgeM-On April 3, 2012: [...]
The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History! « A Nation ADrift-Why?, 9 months ago