To Win in Court, Change the Court!
Posted by By GeorgeM at 10 July, at 15 : 42 PM Print
Seems like a long shot, but nothing else has worked so far. Larry Klayman was counsel in the the Voeltz v Obama Florida Ballot Challenge. An appeal is being worked on now. He also played a key role in Gore v Bush (2000) and is the only one to have ever successfully sued a sitting President. He is also turning to citizens’ grand juries, which he says may be the last peaceful means to help restore rule of law.
Klayman Discusses Citizens Grand Jury to Seek Indictment of Justices Roberts and Kagan
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, cases are still active– need your help NOW!
Support the Florida and Other Ballot Challenges!
Constitution Action Fund
Even if you don’t donate, at least click and read the above
What is the Article II Legal Defense Fund? Find out.
Only a natural born Citizen can legally be President of the USA. ”Obama” is not either.
Subscribe free to ObamaBallotChallenge.com. Please forward. We’re also on Facebook
OUTSTANDING AND EXTREMELY IMPORTANT VIDEO!!!
MUST WATCH!!!
Klayman Discusses Citizens Grand Jury to Seek Indictment of Justices Roberts and Kagan
Go To: http://obamaballotchallenge.com/to-win-in-court-change-the-court
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=gU_o0hdXJSU
Published on Jul 9, 2012 by FreedomWatchInc
WBFF FOX45 – Health Care Reform
Transcript Of Video:
0:01: “Did Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and Elena Kagan violate the oath of office by allowing Kagan, a former Solicitor General of the U.S. Justice Department, to vote on the health care law?”
0:10: Larry Klayman, Esquire: “She had a direct conflict of interest because she participated as President Obama’s Solicitor General at the U.S. Justice Department – in actually crafting the legislation. That’s a textbook violation of the Canon of Ethics.”
0:20: “Klayman is not one to back down from a federal fight, the first lawyer to sue a sitting president and win.”
0:26: “Klayman says basic Ethical Tenets laid out in the Canons of the High Court – were clearly trampled upon.”
0:31: Larry Klayman, Esquire: “What Justice Roberts did was violate his oath of office to carry out the laws of the United States – by NOT taking action – AND BY SAYING THAT HE AND OTHER SUPREME COURT JUSTICES – ARE ABOVE THE LAW.”
0:40: Larry Klayman, Esquire: “Kagan violated her oath of office by NOT RECUSING HERSELF.”
0:44: “Klayman says his group Freedom Watch will seek to indict Justices Roberts and Kagan through the Citizen’s Grand Jury.”
0:49: Larry Klayman, Esquire: “I think they should be thrown in jail. That has to be done legally, under appropriate procedures. But they have VIOLATED THEIR OATH. THEY HAVE DONE SOMETHING WHICH IS HIGHLY CORRUPT.”
0:59: “Would Klayman have challenged Roberts and Kagan if President Obama’s health care law was struck down?”
1:03: Attorney Larry Klayman, Esquire: “We didn’t take the position in the brief we filed, whether or not the law should be upheld as constitutional or not. We took the position in the public interest, that we need a Supreme Court that’s beyond reproach.”
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
“ELENA KAGAN: THE OBAMACARE RECUSAL THAT WASN’T”
By Tom Thurlow
June 21, 2012
“When the U.S. Supreme Court releases its decision on the fate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, JUSTICE ELENA KAGAN WILL CAST A VOTE THAT SHOULD NOT HAVE COUNTED.
===> The relevant rule requires that Supreme Court justices RECUSE THEMSELVES if in their previous capacity they served as “counselor or advisor” concerning a current matter before the Court, OR IF THERE IS ANYTHING ABOUT THE PROCEEDING BY WHICH A JUSTICE’S IMPARTIALITY CAN REASONABLY BE CALLED INTO QUESTION.
E-mails released to Judicial Watch revealed that when in 2010 Obamacare passed and Ms. Kagan was solicitor general, Ms. Kagan viewed the passage as “simply amazing” and that she assigned a deputy in her office to help prepare legal defenses to any challenges to ObamaCare.
When in another e-mail she was asked for her opinion on a meeting to discuss legal defenses to ObamaCare, Ms. Kagan replied, “what is your phone number?,” indicating either that she had too long-winded a response or that she foresaw a possibility that her e-mails might force her to recuse herself if she sat in review of the law, or both.
At any rate, she had in fact participated as “counselor or advisor” of the law when she was solicitor general, and she is clearly not impartial about the fate of ObamaCare, so she should recuse herself in this case.
Clearly a different standard is being used in Justice Kagan’s decision to stay in this case. Not only had she e-mailed her excitement of ObamaCare’s passage, but she has shared in the Obama administration’s strategizing on the legal defenses for ObamaCare. As sitting Supreme Court justice, Elena Kagan could very well be deciding on responses to arguments that she herself had helped formulate when she was solicitor general. <====
If ObamaCare survives its Supreme Court challenge WITH JUSTICE KAGAN'S HELP, HER REFUSAL TO RECUSE HERSELF- COULD BECOME ONE OF SEVERAL RALLYING CRIES FOR CONSERVATIVES WHO WILL TRY TO REPEAL OBAMACARE. Let's hope it won't come to that."
Tom Thurlow is an attorney who practices law in the San Francisco Bay Area and manages the blog napawhinecountry.com. He lives in Napa County with his wife Martina and daughter Rachel.
Read More Here: http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/06/elena_kagan_the_obamacare_recusal_that_wasnt.html#ixzz20U4Yogcc
Starla, 10 months ago
What did we think was going to happen when Ms Kagan and Ms Sotomayor were nominated by the fraud obama to the US Supreme Court ? Did we actually think they were going to follow the law ? And then we have liberal Supreme Court justice Ginsburg that should have been removed when she stated that the US Constitution is not a good model to fellow although she took an oath to that very constitution .
Charles, 10 months ago
Kagan and Sotomayer wont recuse from obama eligibility, therefore obama will win the case!! Supreme Court as shown through obamacare is corrupted. Civil War will ensue, as there will be a citizens grand jury… eventually there will be no laws but bloodshed because the United States citizens are tired of the corruption in government!
TruthandFreedom, 3 months ago
True True… Ginsburg, Sotomayer, and Kagan see the Constitution as a deterent to their power!! None believe in the Constitution that they took an oath to defend! They need to be relieved of duty!!!
TruthandFreedom, 3 months ago