U.S. CITIZENSHIP NEEDED TO BUY OBAMA PRODUCTS
Posted by By GeorgeM at 6 September, at 05 : 36 AM Print
WND EXCLUSIVE
‘The next thing they’re going to be asking for is a birth certificate’
by JOE KOVACSEmail | Archive
Subscribe to author feed
PALM BEACH, Fla. – Sometimes irony can be pretty ironic, even for the president of the United States.
While Barack Obama is selling items such as mugs, buttons and T-shirts in his online store to cash in on controversy over his birthplace and eligibility, it seems anyone interested in making a purchase has to be a U.S. citizen, or at least a legal permanent resident.
At the bottom of the checkout page in the online store, Obama’s campaign has posted the following:
“Legal Compliance. You have confirmed that the following statements are true and accurate: 1. I am a United States citizen or a lawfully admitted permanent resident of the United States.”
The irony did not pass radio host Rush Limbaugh today, who said, “You have to prove your citizenship to buy one of those, because it’s a campaign contribution. I kid you not, folks. [My call screener Bo] Snerdley is in there laughing. He’s got fluids coming out of every bodily orifice in there laughing so hard. It’s true. They’re the ones out there selling all the birth-certificate stuff, trying to make money.”
“Snerdley just said, ‘The next thing they’re going to be asking for is a birth certificate,’” Limbaugh noted.
Obama’s online store also confirms, “Contributions will be used in connection with a Federal election.”
It says, “Federal law requires us to use our best efforts to collect and report the name, mailing address, occupation, and name of employer of individuals whose contributions exceed $200 in an election cycle.”
Limbaugh also noted delegates attending the Democratic National Convention are required to show their photo identification to get in.
“It’s very racist,” Limbaugh clowned. “Not only are they requiring a photo ID to attend, you have to produce it three times. You have to produce a photo ID three times to get in the door. You even have to show a photo ID to get close to the convention center. Apparently Democrats are trying to suppress their own delegates.”
The law on contributions is the same for Republicans as it is for Democrats. But you know that. And so does Rush.
This contribution is made from my personal funds and is not drawn on an account maintained by a corporation, labor union, or national bank; and
I am a U.S. citizen or lawfully admitted permanent resident and this contribution will not be reimbursed by another person.
https://www.mittromney.com/donate/romney-ryan?cct_info=1|25219|7946991837|134331454|7983330694|b|25462070254|tc||g|||&cct_ver=3&cct_bk=donate%20to%20romney&gclid=CIy87O_9oLICFWHptgodX2gA0A
Frank Bolivar, 8 months ago
That’s exactly the point about the irony, Frank. Obozo is soliciting funds for a presidential campaign, which can only be legally provided by US citizens. It’s ironic that someone running for an office requiring NATURAL BORN Citizenship can’t or won’t even prove ordinary Citizenship. Someone who you continuously enable.
GeorgeM, 8 months ago
The point is, George, that he has proven U.S. Citizenship, many times over.
The additional point, is that birth on U.S. soil, regardless the situation of one’s parents, is natural born citizenship.
I enable no one. I merely state the well-settled facts… well-settled historically, constitutionally, and by Supreme Court precedent and by the physical evidence.
Politics and policies and a completely separate matter from eligibility.
Frank Bolivar, 8 months ago
No Frank, the point is that he hasn’t submitted even a shred of valid Legal proof and you know it.
Birth certificate(s)- proven forged. In any case, you know a digital image isn’t legal proof of anything
Draft registration- proven fraud
Social Security numbers (including that used on tax return and draft application)- NOT his.
He hasn’t even proved his legal name is Barack Obama, since the last records available indicate it was “Barry Soetoro.”
Finally, no matter where he was born, by his own admission., his father was a foreigner, making “Barry” ineligible for the Presidency. That has been debate many times. http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
GeorgeM, 8 months ago
“Birth certificate(s)- proven forged. In any case, you know a digital image isn’t legal proof of anything
Draft registration- proven fraud
Social Security numbers (including that used on tax return and draft application)- NOT his.
He hasn’t even proved his legal name is Barack Obama, since the last records available indicate it was “Barry Soetoro.”
All of that is untrue, including the statement that “Barry Soetoro” was “his name”. What appears to be true it’s the name his father enrolled him in school in Indonesia. There’s no indication of any legal name change or anything of the sort.
As to the definiton of nbc, not counting SOOTUS IN 1898 and many prior court decisions of the past and present, yet another disagrees with you. In the second filed Voeltz case by L. Klayman… “Accordingly, there is no bona fide, actual, present practical need for the declaration concerning whether persons born in the United States are “natural born citizens,” as this matter is well settled.”
Frank Bolivar, 8 months ago
With all due respect, Frank, you’re full of it.
Birth certificate and draft registration- PROVEN frauds.
16+ Social Security numbers, including 042-68-4425 used on his tax return, draft registration (documented)– Research by professional investigators Sankey, Daniels and others, using commercial financial databases and accepted techniques, provided documented links to the numbers, Obama, at addresses he lived at at the time he lived at them, including some false ones also.
I will tolerate healthy debate on this site, but NOT outright lies. Consider this your FINAL WARNING.
As to the born in USA of two citizen parents NBC requirement- We have provided you with precedents proving us right. They have nothing to do with Wong Kim Ark, which has nothing to do with natural born Citizenship. Since you’re supposed to be a legal expert, you will know that the ruling for Mike Voeltz’s case did not have NBC as a holding, since it was dismissed for other (invalid) reasons.
Think, why would the Constitution require a natural born Citizen OR a citizen of the United Satres at time of founding, if these were synonymous? They’re NOT, as we have shown you many times. http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html . No more games, Frank.
GeorgeM, 8 months ago
Sorry for the typo.. policies “and” should be policies “are”
Frank Bolivar, 8 months ago
George, all due respect, I’ve never posted even one lie on your site. Zero. It’s true we disagree on many things. When you accepted most of my posts early on, I was encouraged that you (and your readers) might actually be receptive to learn what is actual “evidence”, what is “proof” what is required to be a bona fide “expert” and what is required for evidence to the competent, credible, probative, whether any weight is given to it, what it requires for documents to the authenticated, since we’re speaking of court cases and what the precedent is historically, constitutionally and by law for natural born citizenship, which is exactly what courts have held both historically and recently.
As stated previously i appreciate being allowed to play in your sandbox, and I’ve done so courteously and honestly. If you no longer wish to allow that, it’s your house and you can certainly make your own rules and I respect and understand that.
Frank Bolivar, 8 months ago
Frank:
Looks like we have reached an impasse.
I and many others have looked at the evidence in great detail. Have you? It is unmistakable. So, you are arrogantly dismissing dozens of people more knowledgeable than us who know what they’re talking about?
I have been an expert witness multiple times. I have sometimes spent an entire day or more in depositions while lawyers battled out whether I was qualified. I have always been accepted. So, I know you are being disingenuous in your talk about what a bonafide expert is. Someone who has spent an entire lifetime in a discipline, is judged as in the upper tiers of the profession, competent and honest can be accepted as an expert witness. I know that any other spin on that is pure B.S. It is no special fraternity. Multiple attorneys and a retired judge I have talked to have confirmed that. and no, they weren’t all “birthers.”
You and I know that digital documents are not legal proof of anything.
The birth certificate is so full of anomalies it is beyond absurd.
You know and I know that Obama is hiding most of his vital documents and history. You and I know he could not handle a real investigation or a real court trial with witnesses and evidence. So do his enablers.
We have also seen precedents simply ignored and cases used with dicta that weren’t even part of the holding from jurisdictions that would make them ineligible to be used as precedents. For example, Ankeny is not a legal precedent in any of the cases it was cited in and the portions used were dicta anyway, as you know. You repeatedly ignored my question about article II Sec 1 Clause 5 calling for an NBC or citizen at time of founding. That alone highlights a major difference between two types of Citizenship. The rest is covered well here: http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html
You’re not here for an honest debate. You are here to attempt to sabotage the truth, not to bring it out. You are an Obot, pure and simple. It is a pity that you won’t use your skills for the truth and for your country. We pray for you and others who do so. We pray that our country will shake off the fraud and the huge mistake that is the Obama error, er, era.
GeorgeM, 8 months ago